Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Divisionbyzer0 01-27-08, 02:51 AM	Is there anything of value for 3.5 in the 3.0 class specific books? Some of them look kind of neat. Has the stuff mostly been converted and placed into other various 3.5 books?
Zardnaar 01-27-08, 05:01 AM	Some 3.0 prestige classes I prefer as 3.5 versions kinda suck. Order of the Bow initiate and Duelsit come to mind- I use them instead of 3.5 versions. Apparently a high level fighter type dealing 4d6 damage with a rapier and gets to add intelligence bonus to AC is overpowered when compared to Druid. Most good Archery PrCs are also 3.0 as 3.5 seems to be all about two handed weapons.
GuyrtheadamantineOne 01-27-08, 08:01 AM	Apparently a high level fighter type dealing 4d6 damage with a rapier and gets to add intelligence bonus to AC is overpowered when compared to Druid. Always remembers that these books brought upon us the dreaded Natural Spell feat:P .
LoneFlame 01-27-08, 07:51 PM	Some classes did get ported over(though as said before, some of the ports got watered down a bit too much). However, some didn't. Out of the ones that didn't, a few would actually be viable for use in 3.5(of course, figuring out which is or isn't should be done on a case by case basis)
SkipSandwich 01-28-08, 01:15 AM	Always remembers that these books brought upon us the dreaded Natural Spell feat:P . yes, and that feat was originally a metamagic feat that increased the spell's level by 1. :p