| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Mordin01-27-05, 11:58 AM | I like the revision on the requirements on the animal lord but why do you think they changed it into a "warrior" class instead of the original "shifter type Prc". Anyone else fell the same way or am I the only one that likes this Prc. |
| hiryuu01-27-05, 12:34 PM | I liked the older one, with the spellcasting chopped off and using the new prereqs. I do not like what they did to the poor wolflord's scent. Let me get this straight: it's okay to have a feat that makes your paladin and monk levels stack in regards to your unarmed damage, but giving scent out (which only tells you if something is within 30 feet of you, but not where it is) on a permanent basis from a prestige class is bad? |
| eggplantm01-27-05, 03:08 PM | I like it a lot. Gives a great way to have people who have embraced a totem animal. As such it fits the ranger and barbarian best of any and it is even better for certain monsters. Beware the ogre bearlord! |
| Arcane Guyver01-27-05, 03:19 PM | Reading the class description makes me think Tarzan. Now I really, really want to play one, but I'm stuck as the DM. :weep: |