3.0 PrCs in 3.5 [Archive] - Wizards Community

3.0 PrCs in 3.5 [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
rilem
06-22-05, 12:10 PM WotC recently posted a compendium of all "3.5" PrCs, with the intent of providing an easy reference for players looking to find an obscure class. Here's the link

PrC Index (http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/lists/prc)

And, although the list clearly says 3.5, it includes all the 3.0 PrCs that were never updated — Devoted Defender, Tribal Protector, Justicar of Taiia, Akodo Champion, etc.

I'm mentioning this because, despite WotC's early insistence that 3.0 and 3.5 are compatible, some people don't acknowledge this and complain when C/O builds use older classes. So this inclusion just serves as a reminder that they're still kosher.
Part-Human2
06-22-05, 01:27 PM 3.0 PrCs are okay as long as the DM reviews it with an eye for changed rules. At that point I'm sure many DMs will change brokeness not related to rule changes.
carnivore
06-22-05, 01:51 PM thank you rilem,....nice reminder...good reference

:D
Squirrelloid
06-22-05, 05:53 PM WotC recently posted a compendium of all "3.5" PrCs, with the intent of providing an easy reference for players looking to find an obscure class. Here's the link

PrC Index (http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/lists/prc)

And, although the list clearly says 3.5, it includes all the 3.0 PrCs that were never updated — Devoted Defender, Tribal Protector, Justicar of Taiia, Akodo Champion, etc.

I'm mentioning this because, despite WotC's early insistence that 3.0 and 3.5 are compatible, some people don't acknowledge this and complain when C/O builds use older classes. So this inclusion just serves as a reminder that they're still kosher.

Link appears to be broken =(
Neb Rybel
06-22-05, 06:23 PM Yeah, that list isn't the 3.5 PrC list. No where on it does "3.5" appear in any form (not even as "revised 3rd edition").

It is just a Prestige Class Index that lists every Prestige Class they have published and its source. If you ready the first three classes on it, you would note that Acolyte of the Skin appears twice. With its latest revision first.
Funny Slaughter
06-22-05, 06:57 PM thats a page some of my friends may never see.
i mean they know that i have all this stuff in my head, if they see how much it really is they will charge me guilty with not speaking japanese fluently or something like this...

andhow, its a nice list and should be added to the library maybe.

gs
Funny
rilem
06-22-05, 09:43 PM Yeah, that list isn't the 3.5 PrC list. No where on it does "3.5" appear in any form (not even as "revised 3rd edition").

Eh, it said 3.5 this morning. Guess the cranks got to somebody. The version I linked to only had the most up-to-date version (Mage of the Arcane Order was from CA only, for example). This just makes things more confusing for people. For shame, WotCs.
Ashlan
06-22-05, 10:15 PM Perhaps the link you were intending to post was this. (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dnd/20050110x)

Ash
rilem
06-22-05, 10:27 PM Thanks for that link, I've been looking for that for a while. But I got the right one — as I mentioned, WotC edited the page after I linked to it. Dynamic media and all that.

That updated/not-updated link needs some work, too — it leaves out things like the Divine Seeker (FRCS updated in PGF), as well as 3.5 classes that were updated again (Black Flame Zealot, UE, which is technically a 3.5 book).

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
rilem 06-22-05, 12:10 PM	WotC recently posted a compendium of all "3.5" PrCs, with the intent of providing an easy reference for players looking to find an obscure class. Here's the link PrC Index (http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/lists/prc) And, although the list clearly says 3.5, it includes all the 3.0 PrCs that were never updated — Devoted Defender, Tribal Protector, Justicar of Taiia, Akodo Champion, etc. I'm mentioning this because, despite WotC's early insistence that 3.0 and 3.5 are compatible, some people don't acknowledge this and complain when C/O builds use older classes. So this inclusion just serves as a reminder that they're still kosher.
Part-Human2 06-22-05, 01:27 PM	3.0 PrCs are okay as long as the DM reviews it with an eye for changed rules. At that point I'm sure many DMs will change brokeness not related to rule changes.
carnivore 06-22-05, 01:51 PM	thank you rilem,....nice reminder...good reference :D
Squirrelloid 06-22-05, 05:53 PM	WotC recently posted a compendium of all "3.5" PrCs, with the intent of providing an easy reference for players looking to find an obscure class. Here's the link PrC Index (http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/lists/prc) And, although the list clearly says 3.5, it includes all the 3.0 PrCs that were never updated — Devoted Defender, Tribal Protector, Justicar of Taiia, Akodo Champion, etc. I'm mentioning this because, despite WotC's early insistence that 3.0 and 3.5 are compatible, some people don't acknowledge this and complain when C/O builds use older classes. So this inclusion just serves as a reminder that they're still kosher. Link appears to be broken =(
Neb Rybel 06-22-05, 06:23 PM	Yeah, that list isn't the 3.5 PrC list. No where on it does "3.5" appear in any form (not even as "revised 3rd edition"). It is just a Prestige Class Index that lists every Prestige Class they have published and its source. If you ready the first three classes on it, you would note that Acolyte of the Skin appears twice. With its latest revision first.
Funny Slaughter 06-22-05, 06:57 PM	thats a page some of my friends may never see. i mean they know that i have all this stuff in my head, if they see how much it really is they will charge me guilty with not speaking japanese fluently or something like this... andhow, its a nice list and should be added to the library maybe. gs Funny
rilem 06-22-05, 09:43 PM	Yeah, that list isn't the 3.5 PrC list. No where on it does "3.5" appear in any form (not even as "revised 3rd edition"). Eh, it said 3.5 this morning. Guess the cranks got to somebody. The version I linked to only had the most up-to-date version (Mage of the Arcane Order was from CA only, for example). This just makes things more confusing for people. For shame, WotCs.
Ashlan 06-22-05, 10:15 PM	Perhaps the link you were intending to post was this. (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dnd/20050110x) Ash
rilem 06-22-05, 10:27 PM	Thanks for that link, I've been looking for that for a while. But I got the right one — as I mentioned, WotC edited the page after I linked to it. Dynamic media and all that. That updated/not-updated link needs some work, too — it leaves out things like the Divine Seeker (FRCS updated in PGF), as well as 3.5 classes that were updated again (Black Flame Zealot, UE, which is technically a 3.5 book).