A solution to a problem [Archive] - Wizards Community

A solution to a problem [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
Tweedledope
08-28-06, 12:11 AM So, I've seen in a few places where people want to take the Weapon Aptitude granted by Warblades to gain Weapon Supremacy. However, the fact that at 20th level you're treated as 18th level with no feat slot available pre-epic has proven a problem. I have found a solution to this: Bloodstorm Blade.

The bloodstorm blade gains a bonus fighter feat at 9th level. Thus, if you took 11 levels of Warblade and then 9 levels of Bloodstorm Blade, you gain tons of great ToB goodies and you can get your Weapon Supremacy.

HOWEVER, this all lies on whether or not your DM rules that Weapon Supremacy is a bonus fighter feat. General consensus on these boards is that it is a typo and should be a bonus fighter feat. Also, if this has been discussed already, I appologize, I just got very giddy when I found this. Yes, I said giddy.

-=TD=-
Daeger
08-28-06, 12:45 AM If it really worked like that, don't you think people would've just took a fighter level at level 20 instead of another level of warblade? Seriously.

The problem is, it's not a fighter bonus feat, and I think they made it that way for a reason.
Tweedledope
08-28-06, 12:47 AM If it really worked like that, don't you think people would've just took a fighter level at level 20 instead of another level of warblade? Seriously.

The problem is, it's not a fighter bonus feat, and I think they made it that way for a reason.
I'm still convinced it should be. It's pre-req is Fighter 18, why, again would this not be a fighter bonus feat? The argument is easily followed because every pre-req feat is a fighter bonus.
Daeger
08-28-06, 12:50 AM I'm still convinced it should be. It's pre-req is Fighter 18, why, again would this not be a fighter bonus feat? The argument is easily followed because every pre-req feat is a fighter bonus.
Should be? Maybe. Is it? I'm afraid not, as much as everyone wishes it was.

Also, Bloodstorm Blade isn't a martial adept class, just so you know. Essentially your find was on the same scale of taking a fighter level at level 20, as I said before.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Tweedledope 08-28-06, 12:11 AM	So, I've seen in a few places where people want to take the Weapon Aptitude granted by Warblades to gain Weapon Supremacy. However, the fact that at 20th level you're treated as 18th level with no feat slot available pre-epic has proven a problem. I have found a solution to this: Bloodstorm Blade. The bloodstorm blade gains a bonus fighter feat at 9th level. Thus, if you took 11 levels of Warblade and then 9 levels of Bloodstorm Blade, you gain tons of great ToB goodies and you can get your Weapon Supremacy. HOWEVER, this all lies on whether or not your DM rules that Weapon Supremacy is a bonus fighter feat. General consensus on these boards is that it is a typo and should be a bonus fighter feat. Also, if this has been discussed already, I appologize, I just got very giddy when I found this. Yes, I said giddy. -=TD=-
Daeger 08-28-06, 12:45 AM	If it really worked like that, don't you think people would've just took a fighter level at level 20 instead of another level of warblade? Seriously. The problem is, it's not a fighter bonus feat, and I think they made it that way for a reason.
Tweedledope 08-28-06, 12:47 AM	If it really worked like that, don't you think people would've just took a fighter level at level 20 instead of another level of warblade? Seriously. The problem is, it's not a fighter bonus feat, and I think they made it that way for a reason. I'm still convinced it should be. It's pre-req is Fighter 18, why, again would this not be a fighter bonus feat? The argument is easily followed because every pre-req feat is a fighter bonus.
Daeger 08-28-06, 12:50 AM	I'm still convinced it should be. It's pre-req is Fighter 18, why, again would this not be a fighter bonus feat? The argument is easily followed because every pre-req feat is a fighter bonus. Should be? Maybe. Is it? I'm afraid not, as much as everyone wishes it was. Also, Bloodstorm Blade isn't a martial adept class, just so you know. Essentially your find was on the same scale of taking a fighter level at level 20, as I said before.