Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Stalwartmonkey 04-18-06, 10:25 PM	1 skulk1(racial)(races of destiny) (Dm has ruled i can take -2 to cha and -2 to str instead of -4 to cha) 2 shadow walker 1 (racial) (unaproachable east) 3 rogue1- combat expertise, weapon finesse 4 rogue2 5 rogue3 - improved feint 6 Ft1- weapon focus (rapier) 7 rogue4 8 sorc1- combat casting 9 rogue5 10 sorc2- 11 sorc3- sudden extend 12 sorc4 13 sorc5- 14 sorc6- razing strike (spells: 0 level: prestidigitation, light, ray of frost, and 4 others --------1 lvl:grease , reduce person, true strike, expeditious retreat. --------2 lvl: blindness deafness, shatter --------3 lvl dispel magic 15 Exemplar- artistry to bluff, mastery to bluff, for feint 16 Raumathari battlmage1 (unaproachable east, and DM has ruled that being i may take it even though i'm not going the route of bastard sword. character concept just absolutely does not fit that sword, but everything else fits, language reqs n/a) 17 RB2 -feat 18 RB3 19 RB4 20 RB5 -feat Whatchya guys think? i absolutely hate arcane trickster, so i went with this instead.
ZeroEffect 04-22-06, 04:21 AM	I think you are losing too much of your caster progression.
Mucknuggle 04-22-06, 08:23 AM	I agree. You're build loses too many caster levels. If you're open to changing your classes around, I can suggest something much better. Also playing a race with negatives to charisma and taking levels of sorcerer is a big no=no.