Arcane Trickster vs. Invisible Blade... [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
Diabolic Doppelganger

03-19-04, 01:09 PM
I was wondering which is better in terms of:
1) Power
2) Optimization Capability
3) Over-All Playability
4) Versatility

I have a campaign coming up, and I was wondering which build I should play...

I am leaning towards the AT build, as it seems as if spellcasters are generally more powerful than non-spellcasters, but we are playing 3.5, so I don't know if that is true anymore...

Comments, Suggestions?
helicopter

03-19-04, 01:22 PM
more importantly, you have to ask yourself what your party needs. myself, prism, and snow savant have all played a lot of arcane trickster characters - and ultimately we all determined that it is not a power prestige class. it's a rogue alternative that never comes close to have rogue-like skills.

tricksters tend to be pretty bad-to-average up until 13th level or so. that's a tough way to enjoy playing a character for so long. :(

whatever ytou do, dont play a trickster who is being relied upon to be the main arcane spellslinger in your group. being 2 or 3 levels behind hurts. especially since so many of your spells you need to use just for yourself - to keep yourself effective. and that pisses off the party members who need buffs to no end!!!