Post/Author/DateTime	Post
coldfire_x 08-29-06, 03:48 AM	i think the alig. names need to change cheotic evil to pure evil and lawfull good to pure good
Izodor_Shadowcaster 08-29-06, 04:06 AM	i think the alig. names need to change cheotic evil to pure evil and lawfull good to pure good I do not agree. LE is more evil than CE I think and I always thought CG was the "real" good. But why should we change the names? I am happy with them and we all now what we mean by them.
riceisnice 08-29-06, 04:45 AM	No way, pure good and pure evil would be NG or NE, respectively. I guess by that token pure chaotic and pure lawful could replace CN and LN. But why do they need a name change anyway?
ForgottenDruid 08-29-06, 06:20 AM	Isn't, like what riceisnice said, NG and NE really Pure good and pure evil? CG and CE, from my userstanding are borderline Good and Evil with some flaws? Maybe I'm wrong :embarrass
Carmath The Pure 08-29-06, 06:44 AM	i think the alig. names need to change cheotic evil to pure evil and lawfull good to pure good I'll bite: why? Presumably you have a reason behind wanting this, but without telling us what that is I doubt you'll get much agreement in response.
coldfire_x 08-29-06, 06:54 AM	just think it needed to be changed for 4.0 {i want to take part at 4.0}
Seeker95 08-29-06, 09:23 AM	I disagree with the OP. If we change the names, folks will just say: I'm "Pure Evil". You know... Like "Neutral Evil" in the old naming system.
Morka 08-29-06, 10:58 AM	Why not creating a third axis? Pure-Neutral-Stupid. It could fit for every 9 current alignments. Or while we are at this, Honor-Neutral-Dishonor.
Quixotico 08-29-06, 01:00 PM	Why not creating a third axis? Because people are already confused enough with two axi.
Archangel_James 08-29-06, 08:15 PM	If you're lawful, then you may think that LG is Pure Good, but I, being CG, think that LG is more like Misguided Good. And I don't think anyone will disagree that Evil can get more done quicker when it's LE.
Jezmund 08-29-06, 08:41 PM	Not a chance. Good/Evil and Law/Chaos are great for describing a character. Good/Evil describe your character's actions or motivations, and Law/Chaos describe how your character goes about achieving his goals. It's often a difficult concept for players to grasp because we tend to associate law with justice and good, and chaos with evil or psychotic behavior.
Seeker95 08-29-06, 09:15 PM	i think the alig. names need to changeLooks like the survey says: :noway: :nonono: :pbbbtt: :yuck: :thumbsdow
DarkNick 08-29-06, 09:46 PM	I disagree too. For starters you confusing the Chaos/Law thing with good and evil. These are neither good nor evil. Chaos is no more evil than Law. Also I think there is a third scale in that there is a degree of evil or good, that is if you could quantify it. To clarify: a LE person may be more or less evil than another LE person. Can you say a LE person is as evil as Asmodeus? Probably not. Another way of looking at it is that a LG Paladin could be more good than a LG fighter. Might as well add in another scale within the good evil spectrum so that someone could be Lawful Pure Evil, or Lawful Evil with impurities ;), or Chaotic Angelic Good to Chaotic Tarnished Good. Perhaps the only true evil is to be Neutral...nature is evil - it does not care, its like pure green and brown, therfore it must be evil! Down with the fence sitters! Kill all centuars and druids!
OctoberRaven 08-29-06, 11:19 PM	I Perhaps the only true evil is to be Neutral...nature is evil - it does not care, its like pure green and brown, therfore it must be evil! Down with the fence sitters! Kill all centuars and druids! "And now we start the battle between good and neutral" - Zap Branigan