Bear with me... what classes would Star Trek TNG Characters have [Archive] - Wizards Community

Bear with me... what classes would Star Trek TNG Characters have [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
Puck D'Hoffryn
03-01-06, 08:00 PM This all started when I thought to myself "yah know what would be really funny, to make a Half Orc who is incharge of our parties security and name him Lt.Worf" Then I thought I wonder what classes Worf would have? Obviously some warrior types but what about his star fleet stuff? Then I thought hell lets make everyone! So submit any ideas you may have for: Captain Picard, Riker, Data (the coolest), Jordi LeForge, Worf, Dr. Crusher, Chief Obrion, Wesley Crusher (4th lv :censored: ), Diana Troy (easy), Q, and anyone else Im forgetting.
Herecgunina
03-01-06, 08:47 PM I recommend you change your wording on Wesley's levels.
Seeker95
03-01-06, 10:12 PM All would have levels in Expert.
Warf probably had a few levels of warrior.
Vanigo
03-01-06, 10:50 PM Well, expert's probably the best if you want to use D&D classes. I wouldn't though; I think D20 Modern classes or a custom Starfleeet Officer class would probably be more appropriate.
Draco Strang
03-02-06, 12:51 AM d20 Modern classes would work very well. Shoot...you might even consider using the Star Wars d20 RPG by Wizards. Cut out the Jedi and Force material, rename blasters phasers, and it's not too far off.
StinkinSith
03-02-06, 09:03 PM Yep, d20 Modern/Future would be your best way to resolve those characters.
High Octane
03-02-06, 10:14 PM The characters in Star Trek are too deep and 3-dimensional to be expressed in a level-based system that is created for a technologically different and culturally different perspective that the world of D&D.

A skill based system without the level component is a much better way of expressing those characters.
narukagami
03-02-06, 10:20 PM The characters in Star Trek are too deep and 3-dimensional to be expressed in a level-based system that is created for a technologically different and culturally different perspective that the world of D&D. Thus why d20 Modern/Future exsists. I also must add I find most everything in Trek one dimentional, cliche', and pretentious. But thats just my opinion and now I shall pray as thousands of raving fanboys will hunt me down for speaking ill of their 'precious'.
Jenrock
03-02-06, 10:20 PM Actually, your best bet would be to actually get the Star Terk Player's Handbook.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Puck D'Hoffryn 03-01-06, 08:00 PM	This all started when I thought to myself "yah know what would be really funny, to make a Half Orc who is incharge of our parties security and name him Lt.Worf" Then I thought I wonder what classes Worf would have? Obviously some warrior types but what about his star fleet stuff? Then I thought hell lets make everyone! So submit any ideas you may have for: Captain Picard, Riker, Data (the coolest), Jordi LeForge, Worf, Dr. Crusher, Chief Obrion, Wesley Crusher (4th lv :censored: ), Diana Troy (easy), Q, and anyone else Im forgetting.
Herecgunina 03-01-06, 08:47 PM	I recommend you change your wording on Wesley's levels.
Seeker95 03-01-06, 10:12 PM	All would have levels in Expert. Warf probably had a few levels of warrior.
Vanigo 03-01-06, 10:50 PM	Well, expert's probably the best if you want to use D&D classes. I wouldn't though; I think D20 Modern classes or a custom Starfleeet Officer class would probably be more appropriate.
Draco Strang 03-02-06, 12:51 AM	d20 Modern classes would work very well. Shoot...you might even consider using the Star Wars d20 RPG by Wizards. Cut out the Jedi and Force material, rename blasters phasers, and it's not too far off.
StinkinSith 03-02-06, 09:03 PM	Yep, d20 Modern/Future would be your best way to resolve those characters.
High Octane 03-02-06, 10:14 PM	The characters in Star Trek are too deep and 3-dimensional to be expressed in a level-based system that is created for a technologically different and culturally different perspective that the world of D&D. A skill based system without the level component is a much better way of expressing those characters.
narukagami 03-02-06, 10:20 PM	The characters in Star Trek are too deep and 3-dimensional to be expressed in a level-based system that is created for a technologically different and culturally different perspective that the world of D&D. Thus why d20 Modern/Future exsists. I also must add I find most everything in Trek one dimentional, cliche', and pretentious. But thats just my opinion and now I shall pray as thousands of raving fanboys will hunt me down for speaking ill of their 'precious'.
Jenrock 03-02-06, 10:20 PM	Actually, your best bet would be to actually get the Star Terk Player's Handbook.