| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| DemonDragonJ11-24-04, 08:30 PM | If King Arthur and Merlin were Dungeons and Dragons characters, what do you think they would be? I think that Arthur would be a 25TH-level paladin, and Merlin would be a 15TH-level druid/15TH-level wizard. What do you think? |
| Jarlaxle_The_Rogue11-24-04, 08:35 PM | honestly I don't think they would be statted that high of a level. I think Arthur was probably a Paladin 14 and Merlin a Druid 22-26. |
| DemonDragonJ11-24-04, 08:54 PM | Perhaps I made them a bit too powerful; it is just that they are such legendary figures, that you would expect them to be at very high levels. |
| allenchan11-24-04, 08:59 PM | Perhaps I made them a bit too powerful; it is just that they are such legendary figures, that you would expect them to be at very high levels. When everyone else is a level 1 commoner, a level 4 fighter can seem like a god. |
| Felonious Monk11-24-04, 08:59 PM | Remember how legendarily powerful high-level fighters are. Swinging powerful blows every two seconds or so, able to take fifteen to twenty slashes with a blade before falling, and generally being the center of any combat they're in. One thing that King Arthur movie reminded us of (other than that no one should watch Bruckheimer movies for the plot)- it's a human story, about flawed men, no matter which version you subscribe to. I wouldn't even say Arthur is a paladin; I'd say Ftr 15 or so. With nifty magic items ;) . |
| Jarlaxle_The_Rogue11-24-04, 09:02 PM | Well, we have no DnD stats from the story to base them off of, so its hard to say, I just don't like the idea of 25 level Paladins. Don't ask why (I don't even know why). And yes even my stats are probably a bit hight but I like them around that level. |
| Wildonion11-24-04, 09:13 PM | Tim- Level 20 Scottish Evocer (Even though he says he is an enchanter, he does no enchanting) |
| Vix Damnul v211-24-04, 09:59 PM | The 2nd ed book dieties and demigods, i think it was, had the stats for the whole arthurian crew, but i can't remember them offhand. I think it's one of the free downloads on this page, so if you really want, download, convert, and let the smoting begin. |
| Callista11-24-04, 10:04 PM | Yeah, in most legends, Arthur is no paladin. He is, however, very charismatic, and definitely good aligned. I would probably say Fighter10/Noble10. Several of his knights could qualify for Paladin status, though. Gawain, especially. I agree with the Merlin=Druid idea, though I'd probably give him a wizard level or two as well, specializing in Illusion. |
| Doug McCrae11-24-04, 11:59 PM | Galahad's the archetypal paladin. |
| caeruleus11-25-04, 12:16 AM | According to the 1e Deities & Demigods, Arthur was a 14th level paladin and a 5th level bard. Merlin was a 14th level druid, a 15th level magic-user, and a 10th level illusionist, with psionic ability. According to the 2e Legends & Lore, Arthur was a 16th level paladin and a 5th level bard. Merlin was a 17th level wizard and a 14th level druid. The 1e bard makes at least a little sense, since it had a Celtic flavor. Not the 2e (or 3e) bard. But I would say that Arthur was more of a fighter. And I'd say Merlin was part druid, and part bardic sage (one of the variant bards from Unearthed Arcana, which I think has a slightly more Celtic feel). |
| DemonDragonJ11-25-04, 09:48 AM | If Robin Hood was a D&D character, I think that he would be a rogue/ranger. If Dracula was a D&D character, I think that he would be an aristocrat/lifedrinker/blackguard. If Gandalf were a D&D character, I think that he would probably be a wizard or sorcerer, with maybe a level or two of fighter. Legolas and Aragorn would be ranger/fighters, and Gimili would be a pure fighter. If you could name any other character from classical literature whom you think would make a good D&D character, please do tell me. |
| caeruleus11-25-04, 01:11 PM | If you could name any other character from classical literature whom you think would make a good D&D character, please do tell me. If you're using D&D instead of Conan the Roleplaying Game, then R. E. Howard's Conan would be a barbarian/rogue/fighter, I think. Michael Moorcock's Elric would be hard to do in D&D. He'd have some levels of aristocrat. Some fighter levels, perhaps, but not necessarily. Wizard or sorcerer don't quite capture the sort of magic he had. While the mechanics of the new warlock class (from Complete Arcane) also don't quite fit, the whole thing about getting powers from fiends fits quite nicely. I've often thought of Aragorn as being a ranger initially, and then gaining levels of paladin when he becomes more fixed on becoming king. (This makes more sense with the books, not the movies.) |
| Callista11-25-04, 07:03 PM | Yeah, the "hands of the king are the hands of a healer" thing makes sense with paladin levels. Anyhow. Hmm... Greek mythology: Jason: Rogue/Ranger Medea: Wizard/Rogue Hercules: Epic Barbarian Theseus: Monk (or perhaps Fighter specializing in unarmed combat) |
| Wizard_Of_Arl11-26-04, 12:47 AM | Greek: Odysseus: 26th level barbarian Tolkien: Gandalf(white): 15th level sorcerer/9th level fighter/5th level loremaster (with a permanent stoneskin spell placed on him) Gandalf(grey): 10th level sorcerer/9th level fighter/3rd level loremaster Radagast: 18th level druid Saruman: 18th level sorcerer/4th level loremaster Aragorn: 7th level ranger/6th level paladin Gimli: 8th level fighter Legolas: 15th level ranger Frodo: 1st level aristocrat Sam: 1st level expert/1st level warrior High Nazgul: 12th level necromancer/15th level fighter Other Nazgul: 8th level necromancer/ 10th level fighter Elrond Half-elven: 10th level sorcerer/4th level fighter/6th level loremaster Galadriel: 21st level sorceress Denethor: 10th level expert/3rd level fighter (very high knowledge skills) Eowyn: 9th level fighter |
| caeruleus11-26-04, 02:07 AM | Wizard Of Arl, pretty good list. I have one point about one, though: Elrond Half-elven: 10th level sorcerer/4th level fighter/6th level loremaster Since Elrond could heal, do you (or does anyone else) think he should have levels of cleric? |
| Callista11-26-04, 10:21 AM | I would say both druid and cleric. Elrond has a huge connection with the natural world, as do all elves; and he's pretty much the best healer in that world (not counting near-divine Gandalf, other Maiar, the Valar, and of course fully divine Eru). But it's a book, anyway; and it's really hard to translate things like that to D&D. I wonder how Gollum would stat out? Rogue, probably... halfling, with some sort of modifications from the BoVD... |
| Wizard_Of_Arl11-26-04, 03:47 PM | it would be alot easier to use the spellcaster, warrior, and expert classes from unearthed arcana to stat lotr characters, but yeah i think elrond would be a cleric or druid rather than a sorcerer |
| Walden11-29-04, 01:38 AM | If Dracula was a D&D character, I think that he would be an aristocrat/lifedrinker/blackguard. If anyone is looking for Dracula in a D&D format, try the new 3e Ravenloft book Masque of the Red Death. The book does have some unique rules, so minor adjustments may be necesssary. |
| MadApplejack11-29-04, 09:28 AM | Greek: Odysseus: 26th level barbarian Achilles might be a barbarian, but not Odysseus. Odysseus was a rogue, without a doubt. His greatest virtue was his skill. He was especially gifted at bluffing. :teach: |
| nyysjan11-29-04, 10:18 AM | Dracula would be class:aristocrat/fighter/Rogue with vampire template and im talking about the bram stocker's bloodsucker Vlad Tepes would be aristocrat/fighter/barbarian and Frodo was 1st level commoner or rogue btw how many ways can you spell rogue/rouge/rogeu etc |
| Draco Strang11-29-04, 12:02 PM | Tim- Level 20 Scottish Evocer (Even though he says he is an enchanter, he does no enchanting) If you don't watch it, Tim will enchant your pants off. |
| Sulaco11-29-04, 12:33 PM | What do Arthur, Merlin, Dracula et al have to do with ancient Greco-Roman literature? |
| caeruleus11-29-04, 02:12 PM | What do Arthur, Merlin, Dracula et al have to do with ancient Greco-Roman literature? Should we be expecting a punchline to follow? |
| Sulaco11-29-04, 02:26 PM | Should we be expecting a punchline to follow? The Classical period is that to which I referred. As far as I know Dracula, Merlin, Arthur etc. have nothing to do with it and there is no mention of any of them in Classical Literature (eg. The Illiad, The Odyssey). |
| DemonDragonJ11-29-04, 06:20 PM | If the One Ring were a D&D item, what would it be? I think that it would be an intelligent ring of invisibility that made the wearer immortal, was neutral evil in alignment, and would have an ego score of about 50 (^_^). |
| Farland11-29-04, 06:27 PM | The One Ring would be much more than a ring of invisibility. That is a side effect of the fact that the ring draws much of its power from creating a link to the wraith world. The one ring allowed domination or some similar effect on anyone who wore the lesser rings, and it also amplified the natural powers of its wielder (not wearer) manyfold. I suspect that it also acts as a rod of rulership or something similar. I'm sure it has more powers in the hands of Sauron or someone else powerful enough to unlock it, like Galadriel or Gandalf. |
| Miles Vorkosigan11-29-04, 06:34 PM | an ego score of about 50 (^_^). I don't think so, since Bilbo and Frodo were able to conquer it on occasion. Wizard of Arl, one question, why did you give poor Gimli 8 fighter levels while you gave Legolas 15. I know the movies show Legolas doing some really incredible things, but in the book Gimli is definetly his equal in combat, if not greater. Sorry to sound like a big geek (I'm really a medium-sized one) -MVK |