Complete warrior...3.5 or not? [Archive] - Wizards Community

Complete warrior...3.5 or not? [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
Zendu
11-22-06, 12:42 AM I was looking through my CW book today and i noticed that innuendo was on the invisible blade's skill list. WIth shock i read the entry to the book and theres no 3.5 note! However the errata list says it is!

Is it 3.5 or not? If so what is the skill chagned to...intimidate?
Salla
11-22-06, 12:44 AM I was looking through my CW book today and i noticed that innuendo was on the invisible blade's skill list. WIth shock i read the entry to the book and theres no 3.5 note! However the errata list says it is!

Is it 3.5 or not? If so what is the skill chagned to...intimidate?

I believe Innuendo's uses were folded into Bluff.

The book is 3.5, but it has some of those inevitable WotC slip-ups in it.
TheChilliGod
11-22-06, 12:48 AM Complete Warrior is completely 3.5. The "innuendo" is just a typo, most likely.

Just forget that Innuendo was ever on the Invisible Blade's skill list. You obviously can't add bluff onto the skill list when it's already there, so either don't replace it or add intimidate instead if you really want to; it shouldn't make much difference in the long run, anyway.
Tyler Do'Urden
11-22-06, 03:05 AM The Complete books are all 3.5, it's just a typo, ignore it.
Lorianne
11-22-06, 03:09 AM Complete Warrior was one of the first 3.5 books brought out wasn't it? (I don't have the book myself, so I'm not completely sure.)
It was probably something which WotC designed before the switch, and little things like this must have gotten through. Maybe there's an errata which corrects it, you could check that out.
dokesa
11-22-06, 11:59 AM Complete Warrior was one of the first 3.5 books brought out wasn't it? (I don't have the book myself, so I'm not completely sure.)It came out four months later. Also, take a look at Armor Proficiency (light) (or Deft Hands, I'm not certain which one it is) in the PHB.
Ryusage
11-22-06, 12:23 PM It came out four months later. Also, take a look at Armor Proficiency (light) (or Deft Hands, I'm not certain which one it is) in the PHB.

I checked both; nothing seems out of order...
dokesa
11-22-06, 12:52 PM I checked both; nothing seems out of order...One of them says innuendo instead of sleight of hand.
TheChilliGod
11-22-06, 01:20 PM One of them says innuendo instead of sleight of hand.Light Armor Proficiency's the one.

"When you wear a type of armor with which you are proficient, the armor check penalty for that armor applies only to Balance, Climb, Escape Artist, Hide, Jump, Move Silently, Pick Pocket, and Tumble checks."

Pick Pocket was 3.0, wasn't it?
Also, I find it odd that they left out Swim.
Count Arioch the 28th
11-22-06, 01:23 PM Swim has its own special penalty for armor worn, which is explained in the swim skill. You use that instead of the normal armor check penalty.
Zherog
11-22-06, 01:24 PM The invisible blade prestige class was originally published under the 3.0 rules in Dragon magazine. It's likely that when the Complete Warrior team converted it, they simply missed the innuendo skill.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Zendu 11-22-06, 12:42 AM	I was looking through my CW book today and i noticed that innuendo was on the invisible blade's skill list. WIth shock i read the entry to the book and theres no 3.5 note! However the errata list says it is! Is it 3.5 or not? If so what is the skill chagned to...intimidate?
Salla 11-22-06, 12:44 AM	I was looking through my CW book today and i noticed that innuendo was on the invisible blade's skill list. WIth shock i read the entry to the book and theres no 3.5 note! However the errata list says it is! Is it 3.5 or not? If so what is the skill chagned to...intimidate? I believe Innuendo's uses were folded into Bluff. The book is 3.5, but it has some of those inevitable WotC slip-ups in it.
TheChilliGod 11-22-06, 12:48 AM	Complete Warrior is completely 3.5. The "innuendo" is just a typo, most likely. Just forget that Innuendo was ever on the Invisible Blade's skill list. You obviously can't add bluff onto the skill list when it's already there, so either don't replace it or add intimidate instead if you really want to; it shouldn't make much difference in the long run, anyway.
Tyler Do'Urden 11-22-06, 03:05 AM	The Complete books are all 3.5, it's just a typo, ignore it.
Lorianne 11-22-06, 03:09 AM	Complete Warrior was one of the first 3.5 books brought out wasn't it? (I don't have the book myself, so I'm not completely sure.) It was probably something which WotC designed before the switch, and little things like this must have gotten through. Maybe there's an errata which corrects it, you could check that out.
dokesa 11-22-06, 11:59 AM	Complete Warrior was one of the first 3.5 books brought out wasn't it? (I don't have the book myself, so I'm not completely sure.)It came out four months later. Also, take a look at Armor Proficiency (light) (or Deft Hands, I'm not certain which one it is) in the PHB.
Ryusage 11-22-06, 12:23 PM	It came out four months later. Also, take a look at Armor Proficiency (light) (or Deft Hands, I'm not certain which one it is) in the PHB. I checked both; nothing seems out of order...
dokesa 11-22-06, 12:52 PM	I checked both; nothing seems out of order...One of them says innuendo instead of sleight of hand.
TheChilliGod 11-22-06, 01:20 PM	One of them says innuendo instead of sleight of hand.Light Armor Proficiency's the one. "When you wear a type of armor with which you are proficient, the armor check penalty for that armor applies only to Balance, Climb, Escape Artist, Hide, Jump, Move Silently, Pick Pocket, and Tumble checks." Pick Pocket was 3.0, wasn't it? Also, I find it odd that they left out Swim.
Count Arioch the 28th 11-22-06, 01:23 PM	Swim has its own special penalty for armor worn, which is explained in the swim skill. You use that instead of the normal armor check penalty.
Zherog 11-22-06, 01:24 PM	The invisible blade prestige class was originally published under the 3.0 rules in Dragon magazine. It's likely that when the Complete Warrior team converted it, they simply missed the innuendo skill.