Debate on penalties [Archive] - Wizards Community

Debate on penalties [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
easy_target
07-18-07, 01:23 PM If a monk trains his/her whole body to be their weapon, and you take the feat that allows you to get more than one attack (like weilding two weapons) why should you get any penalties? I mean if your hands are your weapons, why would one hand be considered an off hand?
Morwen
07-18-07, 02:27 PM Why would a monk use Two-Weapon Fighting instead of the superior Flurry of Blows? In any case, a monk is specifically listed to not have an off-hand when striking unarmed.
Erato
07-18-07, 02:35 PM Because it's harder to make many attacks in a round, be it flurry, two weapon fighting, or rapid shot.
easy_target
07-18-07, 02:42 PM Why would a monk use Two-Weapon Fighting instead of the superior Flurry of Blows? In any case, a monk is specifically listed to not have an off-hand when striking unarmed. he has flurry of blows, but also has two weapon fighting.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
easy_target 07-18-07, 01:23 PM	If a monk trains his/her whole body to be their weapon, and you take the feat that allows you to get more than one attack (like weilding two weapons) why should you get any penalties? I mean if your hands are your weapons, why would one hand be considered an off hand?
Morwen 07-18-07, 02:27 PM	Why would a monk use Two-Weapon Fighting instead of the superior Flurry of Blows? In any case, a monk is specifically listed to not have an off-hand when striking unarmed.
Erato 07-18-07, 02:35 PM	Because it's harder to make many attacks in a round, be it flurry, two weapon fighting, or rapid shot.
easy_target 07-18-07, 02:42 PM	Why would a monk use Two-Weapon Fighting instead of the superior Flurry of Blows? In any case, a monk is specifically listed to not have an off-hand when striking unarmed. he has flurry of blows, but also has two weapon fighting.