| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Takasi10-21-04, 12:09 PM | In the same spirit of Monster Manual 3, I would like to see at least an Eberron placement paragraph each for some of the new abberations in Codex Anathema. |
| Kolvin10-21-04, 12:47 PM | Considering that the content of that book is likely to already be finalized you may be beating a dead horse. |
| ieattrollsforbreakfast10-21-04, 12:49 PM | I agree, we need all the content we can get :) I doubt any of the main flavour text will include Eberron specific information (unless its small and includes FR info too), but we might see _____ in Eberron entries in the new monsters. |
| Takasi10-21-04, 12:56 PM | Considering that the content of that book is likely to already be finalized you may be beating a dead horse. Geez, I hope not. It won't be out for another SIX months! |
| fizzbang10-21-04, 02:26 PM | Geez, I hope not. It won't be out for another SIX months! It might be finalized, it might still be flexible. For what it's worth, I'd like to see Eberron placement info in the book. Aberrations are a much larger deal in the Eberron setting than they are in most others. It'd be a real shame if they didn't address that in the Aberrations book. |
| Makseb10-21-04, 02:31 PM | More Eberron Everywhere. |
| helzapoppn10-21-04, 07:13 PM | Between the Daelkyr, the Quori, the Lords of Dust, Mordain and the various powers in Khyber, Eberron has many places for aberrations and abominations... There really should be notes on where the Codex creatures belong in this setting... :thumbsup: |
| MrFilthyIke10-21-04, 09:50 PM | I'd give my vote for this, the Eberron "paragraphs" were the best part of MMIII! :) |
| Neofish10-21-04, 10:00 PM | Aye, Put me down, without that content I wounldn't have used the Kenku. |
| gaerfindel10-22-04, 10:57 AM | Yeah, I liked those little paragraphs in MM3, too. More of it, I say! |
| JohnnyONeal10-22-04, 12:27 PM | I would love to see this. Mostly, though, I just hope the content won't contradict the origin of aberrations in Eberron. I'd be sad if the book took a strictly FR/GH approach to the subject. |
| warok10-22-04, 10:52 PM | sign me up we need more people for the hoard :invasion: |
| Demonologist10-23-04, 08:19 PM | Dude, I am so signed up for this. The MMIII wouldn't have been the same without the Eberron Paragraphs and neither will Codex Anathema. I say Eberron needs all the new monsters, spells, feats, and items it can get. SIGNED Demon :devil: |
| smrtgmp10-24-04, 05:28 AM | It would be a nice addition; hopefully they will be included. I wont hold my breath, though. I didnt see any Eberron fluff in Libris Mortis, but I could be blind. |
| Sarlax10-24-04, 05:51 AM | Like Libris Mortis and Draconomicon, I suspect Codex Anathema will be entirely generic. Each of these books lacks any setting-specific information for any world, including Greyhawk or the Forgotten Realms. Each introduces some gods, but these have the same generic flavor as the deities in the PHB (which, of course, came originally from Greyhawk, but since there's no other link, I don't think this qualifies as setting-specific). Rather than expecting the book itself to have sections dedicated to Eberron, a useful resource would be a web enhancement that shapes all the book's material for use in Eberron. If we don't get that, we can always make our own. |
| DwarvinJedi10-24-04, 12:46 PM | Rather than expecting the book itself to have sections dedicated to Eberron, a useful resource would be a web enhancement that shapes all the book's material for use in Eberron. If we don't get that, we can always make our own. You stole my idea, but [Signed] |
| Joni-san10-24-04, 03:07 PM | Eh, why not ;) Cthulhu Fthagn! |