Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Ananvilhurtz 04-07-08, 01:24 PM	If a target is hit by 2 Alchemist Fires in one round, does he take 1d6 or 2d6 damage in the following round?
steventirey1985 04-07-08, 04:10 PM	Neither. He takes 1d6 fire damage + 1d6 fire damage. Pretty much the same as 2d6, but not quite. If the target had fire resistance 5, the 1d6 + 1d6 wouldn't hurt him (usually). But if it was 2d6 fire damage, he would still take an average of 2 damage.
Ananvilhurtz 04-07-08, 04:14 PM	Thanks, you're right on the damage part. Where did you get the information?
steventirey1985 04-07-08, 04:28 PM	Common sense. If damaged by more that one weapon/attack, calculate the damage for each weapon/attack seperatly.
X0_Lt_0X 04-07-08, 04:57 PM	Neither. He takes 1d6 fire damage + 1d6 fire damage. Pretty much the same as 2d6, but not quite. If the target had fire resistance 5, the 1d6 + 1d6 wouldn't hurt him (usually). But if it was 2d6 fire damage, he would still take an average of 2 damage. However, it would do 2d6 if you used a vial with two AF in it :D
Ananvilhurtz 04-08-08, 12:35 AM	Common sense. If damaged by more that one weapon/attack, calculate the damage for each weapon/attack seperatly. While I agree with you, I was looking for more concrete evidence. The player argues that the damage is from being 'on fire' and that there are no magnitudes of 'on fire'. Standing in a candle flame is equivalent to a bonfire, apparently.
Nathreet 04-08-08, 12:56 AM	big bonfire same as burning building. If you're covered you're covered. Question is, does 2 alchemist fire cover you more than one?
Ananvilhurtz 04-08-08, 10:09 AM	Or does one cover you at all? An flask of alchemist fire isn't enough to cover a creature entirely. Plus the added fuel increases heat and damage.
TheGeek 04-11-08, 07:58 PM	I would rule... 1d6+1d6 He can put it out with one reflex save, though.