armor check penalty and shield proficiency [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
mostholy2

10-13-05, 12:13 AM
Is there any penalty for using a shield with 0 armor check penalty (MW buckler, or darkwood buckler or shield) for a character who doesn't have proficiency with shields (i.e. rogues)?

As there is no armor check penalty, no subsequent non-proficiency penalty should be assessed for any actions the rogue does.

For casters there would still be an issue with arcane spell failure, but rogues wouldn't have that problem.
ShinAkuma2

10-13-05, 12:23 AM
Nope, none, aside for the -1 to attacks made with the shielded hand a buckler imposes anyway. Go wild.
Tyler Do'Urden

10-13-05, 12:30 AM
Yeah. Literally anybody can wear padded or leather armor or masterwork studded leather. Except monks.
ShinAkuma2

10-13-05, 01:26 PM
Well, they can do it, if they want to power down.

Or they think they'll be attacked while tied up.
Nephlite

10-13-05, 04:35 PM
Yeah. Literally anybody can wear padded or leather armor or masterwork studded leather. Except monks.
You only lose Flurry and Wisdom to AC by wearing armor:
Light armor keep most of your abilities: like Evasion, etc.