| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Rebel58112-09-07, 12:59 AM | Is it possible to coup de grace with something such as Scorching Ray or Shocking Grasp? |
| dman1123512-09-07, 01:08 AM | No, but it's kind of vague about it. It specifically says that you can use a melee weapon. And then it says you may use a bow or crossbow if you're within 5'. If you can, it'll only be with weapon like spells. |
| RavenDrake12-09-07, 02:57 AM | It depends. A coup de grace is a full round action, so casting a normal spell would be out anyway. If you had a weaponlike spell(any spell which requires a touch attack, ranged or melee) that you were holding the charge on, such as Chill Touch or Produce Flame, or that could be cast as a swift action (by Quicken Spell, for example) I would allow you to use them to deliver the coup de grace as they count as weapons for all intents and purposes. I wouldn't allow spells which require a ranged touch attack, even if you are within five feet, because it specifies that only bows and crossbows can be used to CDG. |
| Tilakai12-09-07, 07:24 AM | Spell Warp Sniper CS PrC Allows you to CdG with ray spells or area spells that you warp into a ray. Aslo you get Sneak Attack from 60ft with rays. Full caster class too.(I belive AFB right now) |
| Johnathan_Vagabond12-09-07, 11:39 AM | I would allow spells that require attack rolls to be used to coup de gras. It makes sense to me, that if you have to aim it and you can get a crit with it that you can use it to murder some poor bastard. A ray of frost through the heart would kill someone just as dead as a dagger. |
| dman1123512-09-07, 02:09 PM | Coup de grace. Not gras. It's not a fat blow. The spellwarp Sniper kind of clears the water. I can't believe I forgot it. Yeah, no CdG with rays, unless you take spellwarp sniper. You can with melee touch though. |
| mvincent12-10-07, 02:34 PM | Is it possible to coup de grace with something such as Scorching Ray or Shocking Grasp?From the 3.5 FAQ: "Can you perform a coup de grace with a ray spell? No. The coup de grace action specifically allows you to use a bow or crossbow, provided you are adjacent to the target (Player’s Handbook, page 154). That said, allowing spells with a ranged touch attack to deliver a coup de grace against an adjacent target wouldn’t be an unreasonable house rule." |
| Phelf_Der_Zemit12-10-07, 10:34 PM | Stop being lazy and jsut pull out your spell storing dagger. (if that's applicable) if not just do it with the dagger anyway. |
| nightwyrm12-10-07, 11:43 PM | Why waste a perfectly good spell on a cdg. There is a reason why all wizards carry staffs. |
| RavenDrake12-11-07, 01:36 AM | Why waste a perfectly good spell on a cdg. There is a reason why all wizards carry staffs. Hmm... 2d6-2 damage, or 10d6 electricity damage Shocking Grasp... which of those is more likely to be successful? |
| dman1123512-11-07, 01:41 AM | CdG is an auto crit/auto hit. There's a reason it's a full round action. But something like a level one spell at higher levels would be a nothing spell, and pretty much guarantee death. |
| Johnathan_Vagabond12-11-07, 09:23 AM | Although theres always the gritty appeal of cracking someone's skull with a staff... |
| Pennarin12-12-07, 03:31 PM | Is it possible to coup de grace with something such as Scorching Ray or Shocking Grasp? Complete Scoundrel (or is it Mage?) introduces a class called something like the Eldritch Sniper, and one of its class abilities is to allow your ray spells to inflict coups de grace (and a few other goodies, I'm sure) ;) Hope this helps |
| dman1123512-12-07, 04:12 PM | Read the thread before posting as this was adressed in post 4. |
| Pennarin12-17-07, 08:12 PM | ...and it was worth wasting good electronic paper to tell me dman11235 because...wait, no good reason. Ain't the first time someone answered another's post without reading other people's answers first. And let me make a totally free prediction here: It will happen again, somewhere, somewhen. Promise. You might even be the one doing it. Nasty thought, isn't it? |
| Celas Evriamytholin12-17-07, 11:01 PM | ...and it was worth wasting good electronic paper to tell me dman11235 because...wait, no good reason. Ain't the first time someone answered another's post without reading other people's answers first. And let me make a totally free prediction here: It will happen again, somewhere, somewhen. Promise. You might even be the one doing it. Nasty thought, isn't it? Curse that handsome devil. |