Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Cadwyn 03-31-07, 10:03 PM	Would it be much of a stretch to let a character use his Decisive Strike (PHB2 monk variant) in a grapple by taking a -2 on the grapple check? I know this isn't in the ruling, so there is no idea of reminding me, I just want to know if it would be game-breaking or actually working...
HarlequinHelsing 03-31-07, 11:53 PM	At first level, yes, you could do this, but you'd take a -2 penalty on decisive strike and an additional -4 for grappling, for a total of -6. Good luck.
Cadwyn 04-01-07, 07:17 PM	Ah, what I meant was as in damage opponent, not an attack
HarlequinHelsing 04-02-07, 12:07 AM	Well, unless I've been playing completely wrong for 3 years now, you need to attack to deal damage. Anyway, if I understand what you're asking, yes, you can, and it'd follow the same rules as decisive strike.
Cadwyn 04-02-07, 07:23 PM	there is an option in grapples called Damage opponent, basically a grapple check and if you (attacker) wins, you damage your opponent with damage = your unarmed damage
HarlequinHelsing 04-02-07, 10:21 PM	There's also an option called attack opponent.