Heartwarder [Archive] - Wizards Community

Heartwarder [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
Aramoro
11-19-07, 08:09 AM I have been looking to see if I can find a 3.5 update, or 3rd ed errata for the heartwarder, a couple of class features on it clash with its requirements, and I would like to know if there is a reprint of it recently, or in Dragon mag that I have missed.
Stigger
11-19-07, 07:27 PM Don't know of any myself, just did it myself as a DM for a couple of players. Don't recall any major clashes though... well, the SF(Ench) thing was a bit odd, but I just took it to mean GSF(Ench) myself. Or you could remove the SF requirement... either one makes sense to me.
Khaelieth
11-23-07, 09:32 AM Also been looking for it, can't seem to find it though.
The Simbul
11-26-07, 01:07 AM If a 3.0 game feature is not specifically revised in a 3.5 supplement, then it can be assumed to be useable in your 3.5 games as is, at least insofar as any need for "official-ness" is concerned. Relatively minor changes, such as ignoring the word "Scry" in a class skill list are easy enough on their own.

That said, AFAIC the prestige class is not that great, regardless of what edition you play.
Hanali-in-Love
12-06-07, 06:16 PM If a 3.0 game feature is not specifically revised in a 3.5 supplement, then it can be assumed to be useable in your 3.5 games as is, at least insofar as any need for "official-ness" is concerned. Relatively minor changes, such as ignoring the word "Scry" in a class skill list are easy enough on their own.

That said, AFAIC the prestige class is not that great, regardless of what edition you play.

I loved playing this prestige class personally. One of the best gaming PC's I've ever had. It's a wonderful PrC if you know how to play it.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Aramoro 11-19-07, 08:09 AM	I have been looking to see if I can find a 3.5 update, or 3rd ed errata for the heartwarder, a couple of class features on it clash with its requirements, and I would like to know if there is a reprint of it recently, or in Dragon mag that I have missed.
Stigger 11-19-07, 07:27 PM	Don't know of any myself, just did it myself as a DM for a couple of players. Don't recall any major clashes though... well, the SF(Ench) thing was a bit odd, but I just took it to mean GSF(Ench) myself. Or you could remove the SF requirement... either one makes sense to me.
Khaelieth 11-23-07, 09:32 AM	Also been looking for it, can't seem to find it though.
The Simbul 11-26-07, 01:07 AM	If a 3.0 game feature is not specifically revised in a 3.5 supplement, then it can be assumed to be useable in your 3.5 games as is, at least insofar as any need for "official-ness" is concerned. Relatively minor changes, such as ignoring the word "Scry" in a class skill list are easy enough on their own. That said, AFAIC the prestige class is not that great, regardless of what edition you play.
Hanali-in-Love 12-06-07, 06:16 PM	If a 3.0 game feature is not specifically revised in a 3.5 supplement, then it can be assumed to be useable in your 3.5 games as is, at least insofar as any need for "official-ness" is concerned. Relatively minor changes, such as ignoring the word "Scry" in a class skill list are easy enough on their own. That said, AFAIC the prestige class is not that great, regardless of what edition you play. I loved playing this prestige class personally. One of the best gaming PC's I've ever had. It's a wonderful PrC if you know how to play it.