Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Master Sylvius 11-30-07, 07:30 AM	There has not been any new post on the Forgotten Realms page on the Wizards web site since September. Could it be that the company is loosing interest in the franchise?:(
Sol_Odlanier 11-30-07, 07:49 AM	Not at all. Just start reading the others threads and see for yourself.....
Iakhovas 11-30-07, 09:37 AM	There have been a few Realmslore articles posted since September. Unforuntately they can be a little difficult to find, so here are the links Master Sylvius: Tomb of the Astronomer http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4dnd/20070816a The Purple Halls http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4dnd/20070829a Ironfang Keep http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drfe/20071107a
18DELTA 11-30-07, 10:35 AM	I think that the FR Site will be up and running again in or around August of next year. Getting all the bugs out via the main D&D site.
Redrake 11-30-07, 11:04 AM	Don't worry, those will get fixed with 5E.:D
MarkusTay63 11-30-07, 11:22 AM	I was gonna say 4.5 - you're even worse then me. :P
Redrake 11-30-07, 11:48 AM	Worse? I would call myself an optimist, don't you think?:D Especially since I stopped believing in improvements since the transition from 2E to 3E (I still hate them for virtually killing my favorite race half-elves).
Lord Karsus 12-01-07, 12:22 AM	There have been a few Realmslore articles posted since September. Unforuntately they can be a little difficult to find, so here are the links Master Sylvius: Tomb of the Astronomer http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4dnd/20070816a The Purple Halls http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4dnd/20070829a Ironfang Keep http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drfe/20071107a -Those all require you to have an online DRAGON subscription, however.
Mourn 12-01-07, 12:24 AM	-Those all require you to have an online DRAGON subscription, however. No, they only require you to have a D&D Insider login account, which you already do because you have a Gleemax account. All of the account information is shared between D&D Insider and Gleemax. Dragon doesn't cost a thing until 4e launches.
Lord Karsus 12-01-07, 01:02 AM	No, they only require you to have a D&D Insider login account, which you already do because you have a Gleemax account. All of the account information is shared between D&D Insider and Gleemax. Dragon doesn't cost a thing until 4e launches. -See, that is something I did not know. So, what's my Gleemax account? E-mail?
Mourn 12-01-07, 01:05 AM	-See, that is something I did not know. So, what's my Gleemax account? E-mail? Yup. Just use the same login info you use here, and you should be fine.
Lord Karsus 12-01-07, 01:09 AM	-Well, I'm off to look at all of that cool information, then. :)
The_Shaman 12-01-07, 01:17 PM	<< goes off following LK >>
Ranger REG 12-01-07, 08:13 PM	There has not been any new post on the Forgotten Realms page on the Wizards web site since September. Could it be that the company is loosing interest in the franchise?:( Must be if Forgotten Realms is the first published campaign setting to get a 4e treatment next year. :devil:
Fingoldfin 12-03-07, 11:07 AM	There has not been any new post on the Forgotten Realms page on the Wizards web site since September. Could it be that the company is loosing interest in the franchise?:( Wizards is just saving the articles for D&D insider. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?:P
Ranger REG 12-03-07, 09:19 PM	Wizards is just saving the articles for D&D insider. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?:P Wait a minute. :uh-huh: Isn't DDi the "cow" you're referring to?
Lord Karsus 12-03-07, 11:40 PM	Wait a minute. :uh-huh: Isn't DDi the "cow" you're referring to? -Yeeahhh, I thought that was a little garbled myself.
'Arry 12-04-07, 07:48 AM	It might just be that WotC doesn't want to put anything up to avoid any unfavourable reaction.
Ranger REG 12-05-07, 12:51 AM	It might just be that WotC doesn't want to put anything up to avoid any unfavourable reaction. You haven't seen the 4e Forgotten Realms forum. :evillaugh
'Arry 12-05-07, 11:11 AM	I'm sorry, that should have been 'any more unfavourable reaction' :surrender
Uzzy 12-05-07, 11:37 AM	I think it's just a case of poor organisation. New Realmslore articles have been put up, they are just stuck in Dragon magazine, rather then linked to on the old Forgotten Realms website. The request for questions to be put to Chris Perkins for his interview was originally put on the Gamer Zero section of the boards. One of the posters here had to link to it. There is new information and lore out there, it's just poorly organised. That's all.
Ranger REG 12-05-07, 08:22 PM	There is new information and lore out there, it's just poorly organised. That's all. Hey, I'm not the one that suggested that Wizards.com take over the Dragon and Dungeon magazines in electronic subscription format. :noway:
Iakhovas 12-05-07, 11:11 PM	A new Realmslore article has been posted! The Cavern of Death http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drfe/20071205
Lord Karsus 12-06-07, 08:13 AM	-Ah, the Cavern of Death...Can't get more cliche then that. In a good way, though. :)
Rinonalyrna Fathomlin 12-06-07, 10:57 AM	The name is cliched, but the article is actually quite nice.:) I like the information about ancient human realms, and the possiblity of a PC being descended from the same house the lich is from (that'd be an awesome plot!).
Blibbering_Humdinger 12-12-07, 01:45 AM	Must be if Forgotten Realms is the first published campaign setting to get a 4e treatment next year. :devil: Arrow fodder. :schemes: