Post/Author/DateTime	Post
zook1shoe666 08-20-06, 12:55 AM	i didn't see any posts about this.... so here i noticed that the Flay Foe feat said in text an additional point of damage, while the Pulverize Foe and Skewer Foe, AND the table says for the 3 +1d6 points of damage. i can assume they made a mistake? thnx for the help -Zook1shoe
runestar 08-20-06, 03:48 AM	I think it is 1d6 too... :)
Skia Mriswith 08-20-06, 08:22 AM	Yep, they made a mistake with the feats. I noticed the same too and was a little disappointed with the feat when I read the description of it. But considering the other 2 feats, its has to be 1d6.
zook1shoe666 08-20-06, 06:52 PM	*nods* id figure most people would think so ;) otherwise it would NOT make sense thanx -Zook
Yokinobu 08-20-06, 07:33 PM	I just love how they make sure to officially errata such errors, just like they did the magelord. :rolleyes:
zook1shoe666 08-20-06, 09:13 PM	lol... yeah its true. but for some of the mistakes it really helps.
MerrikCale 08-24-06, 10:43 PM	It was a pretty cool book though.
biomante 08-27-06, 09:35 AM	I really liked the book, in fact it is one of my favorites, the thing is that I would have liked it to have the same treatment as Champions of Valor (substitution levels, society/religion-related regions, society/religion-related feats, etc.). Also (man, I am hesitant to open this Pandora's box again in these forums) I believe the CRs of the primordial evils (Dendar, Elf eater, etc.) were too low, I know the idea was to make them more usable, but I prefer to have them as the things that scare even the gods themselves..., even if don't use them in a campaign. (I know I don't need stats to just have them in the background..., but what the hell, I love crunch). In short, I think they should have hired Sean K. Reynolds for this book (Champions of valor was great!).
runestar 08-27-06, 10:37 AM	It was a pretty cool book though. Once you get over the disaster that was Soneillon's stat block...;)