Expedition to the Undermountain [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
Aussiegamer

07-16-07, 06:46 PM
This is MY personal opinion....


I just the book.

On the whole the book seemed very poorly editted.

Good Point:
1: Nice adventures in there and well put on to the format
2: Nice history for background set up

Bad things:
1: Level maps are not big enough and did not show the location of the major spots like towns and highlighted stuff.

The maps needed too be much bigger and the size of the page really, whats the use of them if the detailed stuff is not really visible!

The Skull port maps were also pretty bad on the whole, too small not indication of how the levels link to each other.

2: A right royal pain to locate stuff, as it is spread out through the book. Stuff is mixed up so bad it is hard to know which level the adventure is on...

3: some major parts seemed to be missing, there was a shaft not mentioned from the 3rd level down. Or I could not find its reference.

IMHO, don't waste your money on it!
Zanan

07-18-07, 03:48 AM
Well ... you are not the first in the queue, but feel free to add any errata:

Expedition to the Demonweb Pits - Errata thread (http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=862448)