| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| WizO_BigSister02-24-04, 02:02 PM | "Why are the Forgotten Realms called forgotten?" I know this question has come up several times in the past, but the threads have been pruned. I myself don't know the answer so can you help me out. |
| Cunning Linguist02-24-04, 02:05 PM | Ed saw Faerun as a place once linked to earth, but the way to get there is forgotten.. so it's the Forgotten Realms. |
| Morka02-24-04, 02:09 PM | That's why the Faerunian Pantheon was separated from the multiverse in 3E? :D :rofl: :D |
| Bifford02-24-04, 03:45 PM | I thought it was a title in retrospect, as if the world of Toril and everything about it no longer exists ("a long time ago, on a planet far, far away"). This gives the feeling that the world of Faerun is a very special trove of secret wonders, and that players are privileged to enjoy them. |
| Mirtek02-24-04, 05:00 PM | Maybe bBecause neither Toril nor Toril's (single spheric) deities did ever matter much in the large picture? Reading Planescape supplements Toril is always mentioned as some backwater world about which the high-ups on the planes don't really care. |
| Faraer02-24-04, 05:22 PM | Just today, Ed said (talking of using Castlemorn in the Realms),You could also do what I did in the ‘home’ Realms campaign, as outlined in the article I did in issue 37 of DRAGON: have it as one of many parallel Prime Material Planes linked by gates (3rd Edition: portals). This, by the way, is where the “Forgotten” part of “Forgotten Realms” came from: we people of real-world Earth have ‘forgotten’ the once-widely-used gates to Toril, which gave us our legends of vampires, dragons, et al. |
| WizO_BigSister02-24-04, 06:07 PM | Thanks for that quote Faraer ... exactly what I was hunting for :) |
| Thrudjelmer02-24-04, 06:25 PM | And here I was under the impression that the "Forgotten" Realms were all the various ancient kingdoms and city-states lost in the mists of time. |
| Lashan02-24-04, 06:44 PM | If you get a chance to read the old Dragon magazine articles by Ed Greenwood, you can understand the whole "forgotten" thing better. The begining of all the articles is written by Mr. Greenwood with the illusion that he really has met Elminster. Elminster has crossed over to our world and talked to Ed on many occasions. Ed is always trying to tape record Elmister to get more and more realmslore from him. These early articles is what got me interested in the FR even before there was an official product out. Elminster mentions how the paths to his world have all been forgotten by our side. That's how Ed got the title for his game world. |
| Kuje3102-24-04, 06:55 PM | Originally posted by Lashan If you get a chance to read the old Dragon magazine articles by Ed Greenwood, you can understand the whole "forgotten" thing better. The begining of all the articles is written by Mr. Greenwood with the illusion that he really has met Elminster. Elminster has crossed over to our world and talked to Ed on many occasions. Ed is always trying to tape record Elmister to get more and more realmslore from him. These early articles is what got me interested in the FR even before there was an official product out. Elminster mentions how the paths to his world have all been forgotten by our side. That's how Ed got the title for his game world. Don't forget El also has a portal/gate to Ed's study in El's Safehold that exists in Realmspace. :) I always got a kick out of that in the Realmspace supplement. |
| Thrudjelmer02-24-04, 08:04 PM | As do I. |
| Erik_Steel02-24-04, 08:27 PM | So, is that were all the "D&D geeks have mental problem" type stereotype comes from? |
| Thrudjelmer02-24-04, 10:18 PM | Yes... they come from the "forgotten" portals that link us to Ed's imaginative fantasy world. No, no... that's not right. That stereotype (as well as a number of others) comes from thelarge majority who don't understand the entertainment value of pretending to be a fantasy hero (or anti-hero in some cases) and rolling dice to determine whether or not our pretend character can slay mythical monsters, acquire fake treasure, and save the non-existant kingdom/world from evil. Either they don't understand the entertainment value, or some people get too enthused about their games and non-gamers mistake it for some sort of insanity. |
| niss'tyre02-25-04, 05:39 AM | Well put Thrudjelmer. How long ago did Ed put articles in Dragon about the Forgotten Realms? Have any issue numbers on those? And one other thing... does anybody else think that the portrait of Big Sister looks alot like Bjork? Inquiring minds want to know... :inlove: :love: :inlove: |
| Morka02-25-04, 08:59 AM | There is not only the portal leading from Elminster to Ed. There is also the gods from Babylon, Assyria and Egypt who traveled and became gods in Unther & Mulhorand. :tiphat: There are other gods that were taken from old pantheons, like Tyr from Norse Pantheon, or Tyche from Greek pantheon. Are they the same gods who traveled (like the Egyptian pantheon), or are they inspired by our past pantheons? :confused: |
| Faraer02-25-04, 10:42 AM | Well put Thrudjelmer. How long ago did Ed put articles in Dragon about the Forgotten Realms? Have any issue numbers on those?Ed's Dragon articles roughly up to the publication of the 1987 Forgotten Realms Campaign Set are in #30 (Oct 1979), 32, 37, 39, 40, 41, 43, 46, 47, 49, 52, 54, 55, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 69, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 77, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 110, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, and 122. And from then through to the current "Elminster's Guide to the Realms" column. |
| Lashan02-25-04, 12:03 PM | I got my first Dragon subscription some time in the early 1980's when the issues were around the 70's. There wasn't a boxed set for years until the late 1980's. I always loved the articles, even before I fully understood what the FR were. |
| Neo215103-18-04, 04:39 AM | Originally posted by Morka There is not only the portal leading from Elminster to Ed. There is also the gods from Babylon, Assyria and Egypt who traveled and became gods in Unther & Mulhorand. :tiphat: There are other gods that were taken from old pantheons, like Tyr from Norse Pantheon, or Tyche from Greek pantheon. Are they the same gods who traveled (like the Egyptian pantheon), or are they inspired by our past pantheons? :confused: As far as I know Morka, they are the SAME gods from these mythologies. I don't really have anything to back that up but if they're just inspired... they're about as close as carbon-copies of them. |
| bahamut_003-18-04, 05:05 AM | Hmmm, this is an interesting thread, you learn something new every day :) Thanks for the post Faraer. |
| Mr. VanderMeer03-18-04, 05:37 AM | I believe it has been written that these gods are the same and have travelled over. |
| Lashan03-18-04, 11:42 AM | If you want to find out about the Old Empire gods coming over, you should look at the Beacon of Ra artifact entry in Volo's Guide to All Things Magical. I do believe that is what it was called, and if not, then something similiar. Basically, the Imaskari needed a slave race, so they jumped through portals and yanked races of people (much like in Stargate). The people who were enslaved beseeched their gods. Ao allowed these prayers to be sent to their pantheon and allowed these gods entry into this world. The gods travelled through time/space with the Beacon leading them. From there, they caused the uprising which threw down the Imaskari empire. These gods had living avatars that stayed on in the world and ruled the Old Empires. Some died in the Orcgate wars, some went mad, and all sorts of stuff happened during ToT. With the Unther god Gilgemea (sp?) dying, Mulhorand invaded Unther. Their idea is that they are incorporating their brothers before some other nation tries to conquer them (since they don't have their god to watch over them anymore). Correct me if I am wrong, as I am shooting from the hip here. |
| Mirtek03-18-04, 12:10 PM | Originally posted by Lashan Basically, the Imaskari needed a slave race, so they jumped through portals and yanked races of people (much like in Stargate). The people who were enslaved beseeched their gods. Ao allowed these prayers to be sent to their pantheon and allowed these gods entry into this world. The gods travelled through time/space with the Beacon leading them. From there, they caused the uprising which threw down the Imaskari empire. These gods had living avatars that stayed on in the world and ruled the Old Empires. Some died in the Orcgate wars, some went mad, and all sorts of stuff happened during ToT. With the Unther god Gilgemea (sp?) dying, Mulhorand invaded Unther. Their idea is that they are incorporating their brothers before some other nation tries to conquer them (since they don't have their god to watch over them anymore). Correct me if I am wrong, as I am shooting from the hip here. Correct. Some other details: The Imaskari constructed a magical barrier to keep the gods from follwoing their people These barrier prevented the gods from etablishing divine connecting Ao offered them a deal: Send a single empowered avatar to Toril to work on the barrier from within If an avatar was destroyed he was just reabsorbed by the deity but her connection to Toril was lost forever After the ToT Ao decided to lift the barrier The surving avatars were absorbed by these deities could finally make a true connection to the Realms Originally posted by Morka There are other gods that were taken from old pantheons, like Tyr from Norse Pantheon, or Tyche from Greek pantheon. Are they the same gods who traveled (like the Egyptian pantheon), or are they inspired by our past pantheons? :confused: They are the same. On Hallowed Grounds tells how they came to become part of the pantheon of Toril As far as I recall: The finnish pantheon was dying and Mielikki wanted to saver herself Loviatar followed Mielikki whom she hated Tyr saw his role in his home pantheon ursuped by fellow gods and needed a new place Oghma and Silvanus are the same as in the celtic pantheon, but AFAIK no reason is given for their reasons, they just chose to be worshipped on Toril in addition to being in their home pantheons |
| Brahzs M'ahnkei03-18-04, 12:46 PM | Does anyone remember a Dragon Mag. article in which Elminster and the high sage/ godlike wizard from Greyhawk (sorry his name is not coming to me) met? I am not familier with the "interview with Elminster" articles that Mr. Greenwood used to write up, but the setting, as I remember it, sounds like it may have taken place in Ed's Earth-based study. The two drank soda and discussed whether or not they should invite Dalamar (re: Dragonlance) to this meeting as he was the "new" head of Black Robes. Ring a bell anyone? |
| Faraer03-18-04, 12:52 PM | Yes, the "Magic in the Evening"/"Wizards Three" articles are in Dragon #185, 188, 196, 200, 211, 219, 238, 242, and 246. They take place in Ed's house in Canada. |
| cwslyclgh03-18-04, 01:03 PM | Mordenkainen is the name you are looking for. |
| Erik_Steel03-19-04, 02:00 AM | Originally posted by cwslyclgh Mordenkainen is the name you are looking for. Wasn't that Gary Gygax's first character? |
| Mr. VanderMeer03-19-04, 05:04 AM | probably not his first character, but definitely his favorite! |
| Maximillian Hellspont03-30-04, 02:01 PM | Originally posted by Mirtek They are the same. On Hallowed Grounds tells how they came to become part of the pantheon of Toril What is On Hallowed Grounds? Is it an FR sourcebook? Any idea of when it was published? Thanks! |
| trentlanthier03-30-04, 02:31 PM | Was that the article that Elminster gave Dalamar from Dragonlance a marshmellow?? And met with Mordy from Greyhawk?? |
| Kuje3103-30-04, 02:48 PM | Originally posted by Maximillian Hellspont What is On Hallowed Grounds? Is it an FR sourcebook? Any idea of when it was published? Thanks! On Hallowed Ground is a Planescape sourcebook printed in 96 |
| Orion the Raven04-07-04, 07:45 AM | Supposedly, at some point in the distant past, the Realms and Earth were connected, but were seperated by something or someone into two different worlds. If you look far enough into the past of the realms, you get all kinds of neat stuff on the realms, AO, the Shadevari, Shar, and such. It is very interesting how all this has mutated over the years into the current realms as published. |
| Faraer04-07-04, 07:48 AM | No, the connections still exist, as dozens of sources document, they're just largely forgotten. |
| Orion the Raven04-07-04, 07:52 AM | I know the connections are still there. I was refering to the two worlds actually being one, as in coexisting as one unified world on the same plane of existance. A fact that I do not know if it is still true or not. |
| Faraer04-07-04, 07:54 AM | That was never the idea. Same plane of existence perhaps, but not the same world. |
| Orion the Raven04-07-04, 08:20 AM | The notion was expressedly mentioned in some past sourcebook or magazine. Its been years, so I cannot give you the exact refrence, but I know that at least at one point, this was "the story". |
| Mirtek04-07-04, 04:50 PM | Before 3e all worlds where on the same plane. There was only one single prime material plane and all worlds were just different planets on this one and only material plane |
| guru789206-09-04, 10:32 PM | ok here we go, the fallowing is a list of modern day counter parts to there faerunian, umm counterpart... anyway go to page 231 in your fearunian guide look at faerun, now look at a world map, now look at greenland, now look back at faerun, see somthing strange? now look at zakhara, now look at antartica now look at kara-tur, that is a deformed africa (beyond reconition) now look at maztica, look at the unknown areas to the north and sounth, now look at north and south america and east of kara-tur, you see austrailia and the yellow sea from the north you ser russia, and the west japan yup, you could probably find more similarities, but trust me, faerun is the earth, just twisted. so if they wherent connected it would seem like they should be. |
| WaaMatt06-18-05, 05:07 PM | I was under the impression that a) int he FRCS it says that to get from one cosmology to the next you use Toril's Plane of Shadow, not Astral Plane and b) when a deity goes to another cosmology it basically clones itself. In some 3e/3.5e supplement there is a passage about deities being killed off in one cosmology not affecting their other selves elsewhere. (Might explain some things with what I've accidentally read about Lolth. I've only read book 1 of WotSQ!) So, I wouldn't say deities from other worlds and pantheons moved to Toril. I'd say they sent copies of themselves to spread their influence and expand their fanbase. Or, worshippers. Whatever. :D Are we supposed to pretend Planescape and Spelljammers never existed for 3e FR? You can still acquire plenty of written material (such as the Realms of... anthologies) and see reference to stuff that's not around anymore (ie, Spelljammers). I could care less either way, but I was just wondering if there's any kind of official statement on the matter. I always liked the idea that all worlds exist in one universe found within a prime material plane, but I also really, really like the way the FR cosmology is set up. So... I dunno where I'm going with this anymore. |
| Faraer06-18-05, 06:06 PM | I don't even think it matters what the current rules say about methods of worldwalking. The fact is that it's a basic premise of the Realms, and the passage of gods and people into the Realms is entrenched in Realmslore. That doesn't get superseded by mere rules artifacts that will change with the next edition of the game, especially ones in non-Realms books. Both Planescape elements (Sigil, frex) and Spelljammer elements are mentioned in recent Realms sources, though not stressed, so there's no reason to 'pretend Planescape and Spelljammers never existed'. |
| WaaMatt06-18-05, 06:18 PM | OK. But as a note, I never considered the mention of getting from Toril's cosmology to other cosmologies by means of Toril's Plane of Shadow a rule. It seems much more like a fluff element to me. As does the whole thing about deities essentially cloning themselves into new cosmologies. That one has a rules side to it for the current edition of the game, one that I can't imagine would drastically change if the game saw a new edition, but... I see your point. |
| The WarOverlord06-23-05, 01:15 AM | Just today, Ed said (talking of using Castlemorn in the Realms), I am so trying not to sing "Stones" right now :rolleyes: |