| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Calmar06-01-07, 11:45 AM | Faiths and Pantheons states that he is lawful good, while the Player's Handbook lists him as neutral good. Which one is right? :) |
| Calmar06-01-07, 12:17 PM | Oops, sorry. I thought I have forgotten to post my other thread about this topic, after previewing. Please delete this one. |
| XHereticX06-01-07, 07:06 PM | In core, the Player's Handbook one is right. In FR, the F&P one is right. |
| Gray Richardson06-01-07, 07:08 PM | I show him as Lawful Good in the Realms. If you are using the Forgotten Realms campaign setting, I would go with Lawful Good. There should be a mention in Faiths & Pantheons what cleric alignments he accepts, it is not always standard 1 step rule in the Realms. If you are not using the FR setting, then it is really DM's call. Well, ultimately it is DM's call regardless. |
| Gray Richardson06-01-07, 07:22 PM | Just checked 3e Deities & Demigods, and he is NG in there, so the PHB is not merely a typo, I don't think. Checked 2e Monster Mythology and it lists him as LG (NG), whatever that means. I guess he has always straddled the line between the two, so go with whichever one your DM will allow. |
| Old Sage06-01-07, 08:42 PM | Demihuman Deities also states Lawful Good. Checked 2e Monster Mythology and it lists him as LG (NG), whatever that means.(NG) -- with "Neutral Good" tendencies as I recall. |
| GothicDan06-01-07, 10:19 PM | I really mess tendencies, sometimes... |
| Old Sage06-01-07, 11:18 PM | Agreed. Which is why I still like to use them for my NPCs during games... |
| GothicDan06-01-07, 11:20 PM | Ah, the Efreeti... True Neutral with LE tendencies. ;) |
| Calmar06-02-07, 09:08 AM | Thanks for your help. :) |
| Darakhoranon06-02-07, 03:46 PM | Sure, that annoying little bas**** is L/N GOOD... Ever heard of the "joke" he played on Kurtulmak? Crashing a whole kobold city and killing thousands? FOR FUN? Certainly "good"... |
| GothicDan06-02-07, 06:18 PM | According to the BoED, killing "evil" creatures IS "good." |
| ripvanwormer06-02-07, 07:02 PM | Ever heard of the "joke" he played on Kurtulmak? Crashing a whole kobold city and killing thousands? FOR FUN? Certainly "good"... That's just the way the kobolds tell the story. The kobolds, naturally, want to make themselves look like innocent victims, because that's how they see themselves. The gnomes see the kobolds as brutal predators, so their story is very different. In the gnomish version, nobody died, and Kurtulmak started it by capturing Garl while he was minding his own business. Garl escaped, humiliated Kurtulmak by collapsing his own cavern on top of him (Kurtulmak was a god at the time, and in no real danger, though it took a while before he dug himself out and got everything back to normal), and went merrily on his way. Not that the gnomes are trustworthy, but I'd think twice before taking a kobold's story at face value. |