D&D / LG divergeance [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
chrispedersen

02-03-06, 10:49 AM
Mind you, I'm not complaining about the efforts done by the circle. And I recognize the difficulty in trying to preserve a game environment in a morass of constantly changing suppliments.

Nonetheless, from sandstorm all we got were a few feats and what 2 classes?
Stormwrack, Frostburn even less?

The trend seems to be less from more recent books. The observation I make is that to spend $20-35 on a book from which I obtain little benefit is less and less likely.

My take on it is that the circle is justifiably conservative in introducing new changes for fear of upsetting the apple cart. And so, like SC the default is 'limited' acceptance of new spells until the circle members can clear them, or until enough uproar occurs because of regional access. This puts an enormous workload on circle/triad members.

I bring it up to open the topic up for discussion; my only take on it would be
perhaps you could make one area, one country, or one group of testers.. where everything was legal. And use the results of that area to more quickly decide what was ok and what was to be banned.

My nomination would be Zeif.. since its new = ).

Best

C