| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Platinum03-31-04, 06:25 PM | Am I the only one that is disapointed we can't play these? :( :confused: |
| Greyson03-31-04, 07:10 PM | No, Platinum. You are not the only one disappointed about the Class restrictions from Complete Warrior to Living Greyhawk. See our discussion HERE (http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=198494). I am indifferent to the Swashbuckler. But, the Hexblade I was hoping to see as a class in LG. That is the class I like most from CW. At least most of the PrCs are left "intact" for LG play. |
| Simpi04-01-04, 05:07 AM | Well....if leaving Hexblade out meant that we did not have to suffer Samurais in LG, i'm happy with that. There is still swashbuckler PrC in S&F and Duelits in DMG for you to take. Some Core classes would have suited to LG in my opinion but i'm sure if only some were allowed, people would be whining that 'Why did you allow X and denied Y since it's not broken and I wanted to play it! Waahhh.....' Nah, better just to restrict them all to avoid trouble in the future. |
| Simpi04-01-04, 01:21 PM | It's obvious we are getting suckad:D |
| Greyson04-01-04, 10:47 PM | Good point, Simpi - and I agree with you. It is probably best to prohibit all three of CW's classes, than try to justify and articulate specifics for one or two. It saves time, is clear and just works better, regardless of suitability. |