Post/Author/DateTime	Post
deusxmachina 02-08-05, 05:45 AM	I don't understand why the typical Living Greyhawk adventure is apparently not even put through a spellchecker, much less read by an editor. Pretty much every time we play an LG adventure, our DM has to take time to figure out what a word is supposed to be. The errors go far beyond just having "two" instead of "too" and similar things. I have no idea how such obvious and consistent errors could make their way into a published work. If Wizards needs editorial help, I know a few people who would do it for free. I'd happily let the errors slide in exchange for more Green Regent modules, but I don't think that's going to happen.
psgj 02-09-05, 12:52 AM	I don't understand why the typical Living Greyhawk adventure is apparently not even put through a spellchecker, much less read by an editor. Pretty much every time we play an LG adventure, our DM has to take time to figure out what a word is supposed to be. The errors go far beyond just having "two" instead of "too" and similar things. I have no idea how such obvious and consistent errors could make their way into a published work. If Wizards needs editorial help, I know a few people who would do it for free. I'd happily let the errors slide in exchange for more Green Regent modules, but I don't think that's going to happen. Not to excuse the typos, but one would hope that the DM would read the module ahead of time and figure out the words before you play. Patrick Jacobs
gog 02-09-05, 08:26 AM	<SNIP> If Wizards needs editorial help, I know a few people who would do it for free. I'd happily let the errors slide in exchange for more Green Regent modules, but I don't think that's going to happen. Well I don't know anything about Green Reagent so I can't help you with that. But since this is a Living Greyhawk list you should have the people you know that would do editing to contact their local Triad, we are always willing to accept help. Lance W. Pale Triad P.O.C.