Post/Author/DateTime	Post
isaac anthony 09-06-06, 11:37 PM	I'm reading planar binding, and I'm not surprised that summoning an evil creature is an evil spell, but I never thought of binding a creature as a good act. Let's say I try to bind a Eladrin to act as my bodyguard for a year. All he has to do is fail a CHR check and I'm good to go? I play a chaotic-good elf, and pretty much only fight evil stuff so he wouldn't have any moral conundrums... opinions? thanks!
runestar 09-07-06, 12:25 AM	It's not considered a "good act" in the layman sense. It is merely treated as a "good" spell for purposes of effects that interact with it. So long as what the eladrin has to do is good in nature, I doubt he will have any complaints though.:)
Archtyrant Terevoth 09-07-06, 05:45 AM	Let's say I try to bind a Eladrin to act as my bodyguard for a year. All he has to do is fail a CHR check and I'm good to go? I play a chaotic-good elf, and pretty much only fight evil stuff so he wouldn't have any moral conundrums... opinions? Well, the spell states that unreasonable agreements are automatically rejected, so it isn't a simple "fail a cha check and he's my slave for as long as I want."