Bestow Curse > Hexblade's curse?? [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
Jandulh

02-27-07, 01:24 PM
Ok, so last night in our gaming session we ran into a debacle.

Our Warlock used an invocation (or whatever it is that warlocks use) to curse an otyoguh for -4 to all saves and attack rolls.

I then made my dark companion stand next to it, giving it -2 ac and -2 saves. Our Dm said the saves -'s don't stack, AND that I could not curse it since it already had a -4 to saves (and my curse does -2 at the moment).

So, in essence he is saying a hexblade's curse is useless if some else can also cast a curse with greater properties. He said the only thing that would stack would be the -2 the hexblade curse also gives to attack rolls, but since the hexblade curse adds that it entire -2 should stack.

Any answers?
TheCobra

02-27-07, 01:31 PM
The penalties should stack. Hexblade's curse isn't same as the spell or invocation.
Silversheen197

02-27-07, 01:36 PM
Penalties always stack. If your given a -3,200,123 to saves, then a -1 to all saves and attack rolls, you have a -3,200,124 to saves and a -1 to attack.
Lafing Cat

02-27-07, 03:00 PM
Penalties always stack unless they're from the same source.

If by some weird happenstance you could get -3million to saves, or -1 to saves and -1 to attacks with the same spell/ability/what have you, if you did both, they would have -3 million to saves and -1 to attacks.

Not -3,000,001 to saves.

But yeah, Hexblade's Curse is not the same source as a warlock invocation, (although the warlock invocation may be the same as Bestow Curse, if it says "As bestow curse")