Post/Author/DateTime	Post
KittenWarrior 08-05-04, 12:11 PM	Why does a Cloak of Resistance +1 cost 1,000 gp, while a Collar of Resistance +1 costs less than half that amount (490 gp)? Wouldn't a character be better oof wearing the collar? Cheers, KW
Heron_Marked_Blade 08-05-04, 12:28 PM	Where is the collar found?
KittenWarrior 08-05-04, 12:38 PM	Originally posted by Heron_Marked_Blade Where is the collar found? MotW, p.29 Cheers, KW
Heron_Marked_Blade 08-05-04, 12:47 PM	I can only think because it's restricted to animal-only.
Seeker95 08-05-04, 01:30 PM	Heron is right. It only works for animals. Although I normally object to pice reductions for "custom" items, this one makes sense for a number of reasons. Nobody actually *purchasing* the item can use it. Further, it will not work on familiars (magical beast) or paladin mounts. Basically, it lets a druid protect his or her animal companion a little better, and it lets any character protect a pet.
smrtgmp 08-05-04, 03:46 PM	Man seeker, every time I see that sig I cant help but chuckle. My favorite part is strong brokenation :D
KittenWarrior 08-05-04, 05:14 PM	Originally posted by Seeker95 Heron is right. It only works for animals.Doesn't say that, specifically.. And besides, if it isn't vegetable or mineral, isn't it by definition animal? I'd love to have my monstrous barbarian wearing one of these...:smirk: Cheers, KW
Sancus 08-05-04, 05:34 PM	No, animal is a creature Type.
Seeker95 08-05-04, 07:37 PM	Originally posted by KittenWarrior Doesn't say that, specifically.. This animal collar [...] While wearing this collar, an animal gains [...] An animal can wear [...] And on page 27: Several of these devices are for use by animals [...] Doesn't get more "specifically" than that.And besides, if it isn't vegetable or mineral, isn't it by definition animal? Your barbarian is a [monstrous humanoid]. An [animal] cannot have an intelligence above 2. Then again, I don't know your barbarian. :P