Counterspelling but not really... [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
Nova Fujit

01-26-05, 10:24 PM
ok I search through the book looking for my answer to this question but yet could not find an answer

Lets say I stated I wanted to counter spell such mage we were up against because I had a higher inititive than him...and he cast a spell such as magic missile or a spell I decided that it would not be worth counter spelling (just using as examples a situation such as this has not came up yet but one day may) may I chose to cast a spell like scorching ray at said mage instead counterspelling?

other situations like say a mage was throughing a fireball and I instead of casting a fireball I try to place a wall of ice in front of the mage detonating his fireball early.
Moon-Lancer

01-26-05, 10:33 PM
yeah. Readying actions is saying on said event i will do this said event.
Ander Spectacular

01-26-05, 11:22 PM
This method is almost better than really counterspelling. Ready an action to cast right before the opponent mage, then hit him with your biggest damage spell. He gets to make a concentration check, and no matter how easy those are, having the DC be in the 40s or 50s make the check a little harder. The same premise works well with sniping rogues. Begin hidden, then ready, sneak attack, interrupt spell, re-hide. Its much easier to do either of these than really counterspell(unless you are a sorceror), and it also does damage.
-AS-