| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Wotc_Mark01-09-04, 08:22 PM | Epic Insights: Dragons of the Glacier and the Grave The Draconomicon introduced a large number of new dragons to the game. A few, particularly the larger varieties of landwyrm, can challenge epic-level characters, but once you get higher than 25th level or so all that remains to challenge you are a small handful of true dragons (such as the force dragon). This article presents two new lesser dragons that can pose a threat to higher level epic characters. http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ei/20040109a MJ :cool: |
| Edymnion01-09-04, 08:44 PM | Originally posted by Wotc_Mark This article presents two new lesser dragons that can pose a threat to higher level epic characters. Lol, am I the only one that finds this rather humorous? Lesser dragons that are a threat to higher level epics, when the actual "greater" dragons generally aren't? |
| nick01200001-09-04, 10:21 PM | I wonder if a Gravewyrm can stand a chance against Azathoth? CR 50 vs CR 45. |
| Formosus01-09-04, 10:59 PM | [QUOTE]Originally posted by Edymnion Lol, am I the only one that finds this rather humorous? Lesser dragons that are a threat to higher level epics, when the actual "greater" dragons generally aren't? [/Q DM's can use the advanced dragon rules to increase a true dragon's CR infintely, though increasing it to 45 would certainly take a boat load of work. |
| CelestialBarbarian01-10-04, 04:18 PM | The glacierdrak (should that read "glacierdrake?") has a size category of "colossal." A colossal dragon, according to the Monster Manual page 69 should do the following damage: bite 4d8 claws 4d6 wings 2d8 tail slap 4d6. The glacierdrak statistics block, however, gives the glacierdrak bite damage of 2d8. Should the 2d8 change to 4d8? :) |