Faelcuvyn in MM3 [Archive] - Wizards Community

Faelcuvyn in MM3 [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
Shifting Master
03-19-04, 01:36 PM Wouldn't it be great if the faelcuvyn (http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=161684) was in the MM3? Perhaps WotC should think about including the faelcuvyn in their new monster book. Maybe they could include the new monsters being formed on the boards as we type, too!
ieattrollsforbreakfast
03-19-04, 06:00 PM You know what? Thats a great idea! I was very proud of our Faelcuvyn creation, lets hope the two being worked on now are just as good.
Along with a decent pic, she could turn out to be one of the most popular monsters (well, maybe). In 20 years time when I'm moaning about 5e being no where near as good as good old 3e, it would be great to flick through the MM and say "You see that fey there that everyone loves? A group of us of the WotC boards made that." And no one will believe me.
Nei
03-20-04, 06:59 AM That would be awesome! Maybe someone can mail Wizards about this? (Since Waesel started the thread, I think he should have the honours). If it's too late too include it in MM3 they can always include it in another book.

Nei
Gez
03-20-04, 11:39 AM Don't even expect it.

Publishing a work created on messageboards as a collective effort would require them to contact each of the writer and issue them contracts. Too much of a hassle.

If you want to see this creature published, wait for an open call by some d20 publishers. Sword & Sorcery Studio frequently use this system (its Creature Collections volume 2, 3, and 4 (upcoming) have been written this way).
Lokahn Mandrake
03-20-04, 12:10 PM By the way, I glanced thru the finished product on the faelcuvyn and I noticed that you didn't state at what sorceror level they use their spell-like abilities. Could you please let us know what level they use those abilities at?

Thanks,

LM
the_heart
03-22-04, 07:50 AM Originally posted by Lokahn Mandrake
By the way, I glanced thru the finished product on the faelcuvyn and I noticed that you didn't state at what sorceror level they use their spell-like abilities. Could you please let us know what level they use those abilities at?

Thanks,

LM meh! i kinda assumed if no caster level was mentioned it defaulted to equal HD.
Shifting Master
03-22-04, 03:32 PM Originally posted by Gez
Don't even expect it.

Publishing a work created on messageboards as a collective effort would require them to contact each of the writer and issue them contracts. Too much of a hassle.

If you want to see this creature published, wait for an open call by some d20 publishers. Sword & Sorcery Studio frequently use this system (its Creature Collections volume 2, 3, and 4 (upcoming) have been written this way).

I don't think that this would matter. If each person who worked in the thread added their typed signature to a specific thread made for the purpose of showing WotC that we will let them use the Faelcuvyn, then we will be fine, and no work for WotC about that.

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Shifting Master 03-19-04, 01:36 PM	Wouldn't it be great if the faelcuvyn (http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=161684) was in the MM3? Perhaps WotC should think about including the faelcuvyn in their new monster book. Maybe they could include the new monsters being formed on the boards as we type, too!
ieattrollsforbreakfast 03-19-04, 06:00 PM	You know what? Thats a great idea! I was very proud of our Faelcuvyn creation, lets hope the two being worked on now are just as good. Along with a decent pic, she could turn out to be one of the most popular monsters (well, maybe). In 20 years time when I'm moaning about 5e being no where near as good as good old 3e, it would be great to flick through the MM and say "You see that fey there that everyone loves? A group of us of the WotC boards made that." And no one will believe me.
Nei 03-20-04, 06:59 AM	That would be awesome! Maybe someone can mail Wizards about this? (Since Waesel started the thread, I think he should have the honours). If it's too late too include it in MM3 they can always include it in another book. Nei
Gez 03-20-04, 11:39 AM	Don't even expect it. Publishing a work created on messageboards as a collective effort would require them to contact each of the writer and issue them contracts. Too much of a hassle. If you want to see this creature published, wait for an open call by some d20 publishers. Sword & Sorcery Studio frequently use this system (its Creature Collections volume 2, 3, and 4 (upcoming) have been written this way).
Lokahn Mandrake 03-20-04, 12:10 PM	By the way, I glanced thru the finished product on the faelcuvyn and I noticed that you didn't state at what sorceror level they use their spell-like abilities. Could you please let us know what level they use those abilities at? Thanks, LM
the_heart 03-22-04, 07:50 AM	Originally posted by Lokahn Mandrake By the way, I glanced thru the finished product on the faelcuvyn and I noticed that you didn't state at what sorceror level they use their spell-like abilities. Could you please let us know what level they use those abilities at? Thanks, LM meh! i kinda assumed if no caster level was mentioned it defaulted to equal HD.
Shifting Master 03-22-04, 03:32 PM	Originally posted by Gez Don't even expect it. Publishing a work created on messageboards as a collective effort would require them to contact each of the writer and issue them contracts. Too much of a hassle. If you want to see this creature published, wait for an open call by some d20 publishers. Sword & Sorcery Studio frequently use this system (its Creature Collections volume 2, 3, and 4 (upcoming) have been written this way). I don't think that this would matter. If each person who worked in the thread added their typed signature to a specific thread made for the purpose of showing WotC that we will let them use the Faelcuvyn, then we will be fine, and no work for WotC about that.