Need Opinions on Skin Ectoplasmic Armor [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
Grimmsfeld

03-12-07, 01:14 AM
Would it be unbalancing to be able to enhance a skin of ectoplasmic armor as though it were regular armor? Maybe normal enhancement cost times two?
calronmoonflower

03-12-07, 01:27 AM
Well?

I guess...

You could.

I personally cannot think of any rule against it, unless you rule that Ectoplasmic Armor isn't armor?
Grimmsfeld

03-12-07, 02:23 AM
That's just the thing, though: it isn't armor. I remember in the Arms and Equipment guide, it gave guidelines for enhancing bracers of armor past +8 IRCC, but it's 3.0, and not exactly kosher with my DM...
calronmoonflower

03-12-07, 03:09 AM
Well the description says that it becomes "a suit of slivery, ectoplasmic full plate armor."

You can always ask your DM if you can. You might suggest that someone that can make the item can improve it with craft psionic weapons and armor.

i really only has a few advantages over full plate. It can be donned quickly and doesn't impose a movement penalty and has a big drawback if dispelled.

I personally doesn't think it would be game breaking to psionically enhance it like normal full plate.
TalonofTiamat

03-12-07, 05:19 PM
Actually, the text says "When donned, it appears as a suit of silvery, ectoplasmic full plate armor." Therefore, it is not actual armor. Ultimately, it's the DM's call.