PP Reserve = Wild Talent [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
ravenofein

07-15-07, 07:56 PM
Someone posted on these boards that Wizards/Sage had ruled that PP reserve would be equal to the Wild Talent feat for entering a Prestige Class, ie the FoZ from XPH. Does anyone know if/and/or where this is printed?
kyeudo

07-15-07, 08:02 PM
RAW, you must have Wild Talent. For a houserule, making it Wild Talent or Psionic Talent wouldn't be unbalanced.
Tempest Stormwind

07-15-07, 08:10 PM
Someone posted on these boards that Wizards/Sage had ruled that PP reserve would be equal to the Wild Talent feat for entering a Prestige Class, ie the FoZ from XPH. Does anyone know if/and/or where this is printed?

Nowhere. That would require them to support psionics.

Ask CustServ. We only say it's "official" because we get that response back far more often than we get a "no" response back.
Amaril

07-15-07, 09:24 PM
I've mentioned this in response to this topic on numerous occasions. My guess as to why it explicitly states Wild Talent as a requirement is because Zuoken is originally a human (bakluni) deity in the World of Greyhawk. I think the flavor behind it assumes that disciples of Zuoken would be human by nature. Any psionic races meet the requirement that Wild Talent fulfills for humans, specifically a PP reserve.
Salla

07-15-07, 09:40 PM
I've mentioned this in response to this topic on numerous occasions. My guess as to why it explicitly states Wild Talent as a requirement is because Zuoken is originally a human (bakluni) deity in the World of Greyhawk. I think the flavor behind it assumes that disciples of Zuoken would be human by nature. Any psionic races meet the requirement that Wild Talent fulfills for humans, specifically a PP reserve.

Makes as much sense as anything.
The_Shaman

07-16-07, 09:18 AM
I have also mentioned it, as someone put a CustServ ruling in a thread awhile ago. Is there a database of Customer service answers we can link to, btw?
kyeudo

07-16-07, 12:13 PM
Probably not, otherwise we'd get less conflicting answers.