Post/Author/DateTime	Post
Sameil 02-24-08, 02:44 PM	Does anyone know where i can find the Psy-theif? I know ive seen it, weither it was a feat or a class; how ever im pretty sure it was a feat, preqs being like wild talent or a power point & steal spell ability. But i need to know the details so i can use them in my campaign =0). Thanks & sorry if this has been asked before =0).
calronmoonflower 02-24-08, 02:54 PM	Ah that... It is a alt. version of the spellthief mentioned n the entry in the Complete Adventurer.
awaken_D_M_golem 02-24-08, 02:56 PM	I went to the Psi-FAQ, up on the top of this board ... but I've been there before, ;) . You probably mean Psychic Rogue ----> linky (http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/psm/20040723b) But you might mean (psi-)Spellthief ---> linky (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ex/20050107a) There's a little box on Spellthief, that says: A campaign that includes psionic characters, as described in the Expanded Psionics Handbook, would logically have room for psionic-themed spellthieves. If psionics are common in your game, you have two options. The first is to allow spellthieves to affect both spells and psionic powers. The second is to create a new class, the psithief, that functions identically to the spellthief except that its special abilities affect psionic powers only. In either case, a spellthief who can affect psionic powers treats psionic powers as if they were spells of the same level, allowing him to steal, absorb, or discover known psionic powers as normal for spells. A spellthief can't augment a stolen power, even if he has power points available of his own. Treat psi-like abilities as spell-like abilities for the purpose of a spellthief's stealing these abilities. Psychic Rogue hasn't been the object of a good hashing out. A Psi- version of Spellthief, or Spellthief with the psi-feat in Complete Scoundrel, hasn't been hased out either (or). Another idea is Rogue 1 / Psion 19.
Jaxgaret 02-24-08, 07:47 PM	There is also, of course, the Lurk (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/cwc/20061003), which may or may not interest you.
kyeudo 02-25-08, 09:01 PM	Complete Scoundrel has the feat Psi-Thief, which is the closest they ever came to making the Psi-Thief as a class.
BrainHurts 02-26-08, 09:47 AM	Complete Scoundrel has the feat Psi-Thief, which is the closest they ever came to making the Psi-Thief as a class. 'They'..? Can I assume you mean in a book? Because there has been pleanty of good Rogue stuff put out by wizards through the website.
kyeudo 02-26-08, 11:15 AM	I wasn't talking about Rogue stuff. I was talking about the psionic version of the Spellthief. WotC has never done more than print that single feat. Just one more reason why WotC must hate psionics.
Sameil 02-27-08, 01:04 AM	thanks to you all =0) usually dont go into forums =0P so post things and forget about them like this question =0P ehheeh thanks again =0) yall stay safe =0)
Bacris 02-27-08, 08:49 AM	Just one more reason why WotC must hate psionics. I think if that were true, we wouldn't be seeing a "Psionic" power source and a niche specifically for psionics built into 4th Edition. :) Just saying. Some of the 3.5 developers may have had horrible interpretations for psionics, but it at least seems like they're trying to do it justice in 4E.
kyeudo 02-27-08, 11:33 AM	They only are sticking psionics in just so they don't have to retool all the fluff for Eberron. Besides, the new psionic power source won't realy differ much from the arcane or divine power source in the new model.[/cynicism]
Ecalsneerg 02-27-08, 01:41 PM	They only are sticking psionics in just so they don't have to retool all the fluff for Eberron. Besides, the new psionic power source won't realy differ much from the arcane or divine power source in the new model.[/cynicism] Considering they've already admitted to removing stuff from the Wizard to carve a niche for the Psion, I'd say that's unlikely.