Goliaths Lawfull? [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
ToastedAmphibian

08-27-07, 09:52 PM
Acording to the WoTC preview of races of stone, Goliaths are usually lawful aligned. This is all well and good, but there favored class is barbarian... eh?
Borris

08-28-07, 02:11 AM
According to Races of Stone, Goliaths are usually True Neutral with a slight tendency toard chaos, and a slight reference for good over evil. Besides, all six of the deities given in the Goliath panteon are True Neutral.
ToastedAmphibian

08-29-07, 10:17 PM
From http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/iw/20040711b&page=5
Does this contradict the book?
Alignment: Goliaths have a slight tendency toward chaotic alignments, which is reflected in their wanderlust and the small, mobile communities in which they live. Still, each goliath tribe has one or more adjudicators that settle disputes within the clan, and such goliaths are generally lawful. Goliaths have a slight preference toward good over evil, since among the high mountain peaks, survival becomes much easier when one aids a fellow goliath without insisting on recompense.
StruckingFuggle

08-29-07, 10:47 PM
Well ... Aren't Goliath PCs (and a lot of npcs unless you come upon a settlement) usually some form of outcast or another?
hazhar

08-29-07, 10:56 PM
From http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/iw/20040711b&page=5
Does this contradict the book?
Alignment: Goliaths have a slight tendency toward chaotic alignments, which is reflected in their wanderlust and the small, mobile communities in which they live. Still, each goliath tribe has one or more adjudicators that settle disputes within the clan, and such goliaths are generally lawful. Goliaths have a slight preference toward good over evil, since among the high mountain peaks, survival becomes much easier when one aids a fellow goliath without insisting on recompense.

That clearly refers to these tribal "adjudicators" as being the lawful ones, not the general Goliath populace.
ToastedAmphibian

08-29-07, 11:21 PM
That clearly refers to these tribal "adjudicators" as being the lawful ones, not the general Goliath populace.
Hmm... yes...

Read that wrong i did.
Read it to say As such not And such.

Thanks for reconcilling that problem in me head
hazhar

08-29-07, 11:22 PM
No..... the clearly referes to Goliaths as a whole being "Generally Lawful"

Hence the phrase "... as such, Goliaths are generally lawful"

it says "and such Goliaths are generally lawful". Referring to the adjudicators.
ToastedAmphibian

08-30-07, 12:00 AM
it says "and such Goliaths are generally lawful". Referring to the adjudicators.

Wow yoru quick, that was up for about 3 secounds before i realised my mistake and fixed it!