Goliaths: Races Of Stone [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
Stormheart

06-08-07, 12:03 PM
I feel the Goliath's EL rating of +1 is too low it should be +2 at the least.

What does eveyone else think?
Crimson_Concerto

06-08-07, 01:05 PM
I think it's fine as an LA +1. It's one of the few creatures actually worth it's LA, last I remember. What makes you think it needs to be higher?
HairyApe

06-08-07, 01:13 PM
You know, I've always compared the Half-Ogre and the Goliath and wondered exactly what pushed the half-ogre to the +2. Is it just the reach? (Very useful, I know). Is the Half ogre too little for a +2 then? Or is it just a really low one?
If the goliath is balanced...I wonder about the Half-Ogre.
Geezer

06-08-07, 02:48 PM
The half-ogre template increases the base creatures size by 1, thus giving them the corresponding changes to their ability scores, ie: even higher Str. Unless you're talking about a half-ogre race, in which case ignore this post.

But on the concept of being worth the LA, goliaths are one of the few LA +1 races that are mechanically worth it. That being said, goliaths have more oomph than the standard LA +1 race, and are on the borderline for LA +2, but not quite there IMO.
Salla

06-08-07, 02:50 PM
You know, I've always compared the Half-Ogre and the Goliath and wondered exactly what pushed the half-ogre to the +2. Is it just the reach? (Very useful, I know). Is the Half ogre too little for a +2 then? Or is it just a really low one?
If the goliath is balanced...I wonder about the Half-Ogre.


It's the reach.
RobbyPants

06-08-07, 03:41 PM
I feel the Goliath's EL rating of +1 is too low it should be +2 at the least.

What does eveyone else think?
It's certainly more powerful than other LA +1 races, but I think it's good where it's at. LA +2 would be way too much.