Post/Author/DateTime	Post
The_Rogue 05-25-07, 03:56 PM	Do these things really make good rogues? +4 Con -2 Int and -4 CHA?
Marcotic 05-25-07, 04:13 PM	good question why would it? Why wouldn't it?
AZNsupermarket 05-25-07, 04:56 PM	They won't charismatic rogues, but they could specialize in other roguish areas (going into combat, being a skill monkey by dealing with traps, locks, or other areas that most PCs don't have enough ranks to go into).
AMGriffin 05-25-07, 05:08 PM	But they have an intelligence penalty, so they're already disadvantaged as skill monkies... They're rogues because nothing else really fits I guess. I can vaguely imagine them as rogues that are petty thieves and criminals in large cities because they are so reviled there is nothing else they can do to survive.
Salla 05-25-07, 05:11 PM	Favored Class is based on cultural leanings, not necessarily statistic affinity or racial abilities. Elves, for example, make crappy wizards.
The Ubbergeek 05-25-07, 05:39 PM	But they have an intelligence penalty, so they're already disadvantaged as skill monkies... They're rogues because nothing else really fits I guess. I can vaguely imagine them as rogues that are petty thieves and criminals in large cities because they are so reviled there is nothing else they can do to survive. A nice explanation, and logical one. (Elves don't make too bad wizards, really.... But never try to get in 'your face' combat though)
Marcotic 05-26-07, 12:19 AM	Yes, there Favored class must be fluff, but they would make killer clerics or tack on the Dragonborn race and go into Dragon Shaman