Post/Author/DateTime	Post
snakeman830 07-12-07, 09:40 AM	Have an undead or construct barbarian's rage last longer, since they normally only last three rounds. Anything with a constitution score has a rage that lasts 3 + (newly improved) Con modifier. I was wondering if there was a feat that did something similar for those without one. If not, I propose a new feat. Unnatural Rage Prerequisites: Con --, Rage ability Benefit: Use your Charisma modifier instead of your Con modifer for the duration of your rage. In addition, your rage now increases your Charisma score instead of your Constition score (by the same amount it would have increase your Constitution if you had one). Normal: A rage's duration is determined by the Constitution modifier and the rage increases the Constitution score. Any thoughts?
Ace_of_time 07-12-07, 10:19 AM	Cha replaces con mods for most thing for undead like concen checks and DCs. It would be that far of a stretch to do it with rage. ask your DM.
serow_#R 07-12-07, 11:05 AM	Extend Rage, from Complete Warrior? Entends rage by 5 rounds.
qwerty1 07-12-07, 11:08 AM	Sounds reasonable snakeman830 Unnatural Rage Prerequisites: Con --, Rage ability Benefit: Add your Charisma modifier to the duration of your rage. In addition, your rage now increases your Charisma score by the same amount it would increase your Constitution (if you had one). Normal: A rage's duration is determined by the Constitution modifier and the rage increases the Constitution score. I likea Dis.
tarkin 07-12-07, 11:38 AM	I like it. Note, to avoid potential wierd problems/confusion, I might insist on the following slight wording change. Use your Charisma modifier instead of your Con modifer for the duration of your rage. In addition, your rage now increases your Charisma score instead of your Constition score (by the same amount it would have increase your Constitution if you had one). Thus if someoen finds some wierd way to get the feat without having a Con of --, it won't become abusive.
Dalthbar 07-12-07, 11:41 AM	"Wow, did that guy that just started hacking our buddies just get like, 4 times more sexy or is it just me?" "No dude, I'm with you on that one!"
snakeman830 07-12-07, 02:55 PM	I like it. Note, to avoid potential wierd problems/confusion, I might insist on the following slight wording change. Thus if someoen finds some wierd way to get the feat without having a Con of --, it won't become abusive. Duly noted and it has been changed. "Wow, did that guy that just started hacking our buddies just get like, 4 times more sexy or is it just me?" "No dude, I'm with you on that one!" :heehee