| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Tommyboy02-03-08, 01:40 AM | Would it be unbalanced and/or unfluffy to allow Darfelians to take the Goliath auspicious marking feats? The paterns on Darfelians do have meanings after all. |
| smeagol_lied02-03-08, 09:59 AM | I wouldn't say so, but without taking another look I wouldn't know. Perhaps change the names, or create some more that are aquatic-specific and allow a few to be available to both races. |
| Count Arioch the 28th02-03-08, 11:33 AM | What book are Darfelians from? |
| Xiuhcoatl02-03-08, 12:01 PM | Stormwrack, presumably. |
| Count Arioch the 28th02-03-08, 12:15 PM | Dang, it would be from a book I don't have :P . |
| InkBlot02-03-08, 01:05 PM | Darfellan are also available in the Stormwrack excerpt. (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ex/20050805a&page=2) I don't think Auspicious Markings is appropriate for a Darfallen. Their markings are passed down through family lines. Their markings tell their heritage, not their destiny. Every Darfallen in a family would have the same, or nearly the same markings. They're not auspicious. The only auspicious markings a Darfallen would have are actually a lack of markings. Darfallens with entirely black or entirely white skin could have some sort of feat to represent their greater destinies, but Auspicious Marking doesn't seem right. There are five different Marking feats, but only two kinds of special markings a Darfallen can have. I suppose Auspicious Markings could work in a pinch, but it seems like there should be a much better way of going about representing the special destinies of a solid-color Darfallen. A darfellan's most striking feature is his or her jet-black skin, glossy and hairless, broken by varied white markings. The size, shape, and location of the white areas distinguish family groups and quickly identify an individual's heritage to other darfellans and those who know how to read darfellan markings. Occasionally individuals are born who are entirely black or, much more rarely, wholly white. Such births are always seen as portentous, and the children are destined to hold positions of importance among the people -- whether they are so inclined or not. The appearance of an entirely white darfellan is taken as a sign of great events, and the people's history is filled with stories of the upheavals that followed such births. |
| Tommyboy02-04-08, 11:41 AM | Ok, stupid me posting with out reading. Just saw the feats in RoS and thought hmmmm, I wonder... |