Double post, please ignore. [Archive] - Wizards Community

Double post, please ignore. [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTime Post
tundrawalker
08-18-07, 09:44 PM Double post, sorry. Don't you hate when that happens!
Majick
08-19-07, 12:31 PM I agree completely with this statment: They should unquestionably be able to be used together

I believe this was most likely the original intent of the wizards boards chaps and chap-ettes, and if not, then it should have been, because it makes perfect sense that the in-between-moves-'attack'-action would simply be "You may make a standard action attack during your movement phase at any point, then continue to move after"
Crimson_Concerto
08-19-07, 01:22 PM I agree completely with this statment: They should unquestionably be able to be used together

I believe this was most likely the original intent of the wizards boards chaps and chap-ettes, and if not, then it should have been, because it makes perfect sense that the in-between-moves-'attack'-action would simply be "You may make a standard action attack during your movement phase at any point, then continue to move after"...This topic was double-posted. Check the one (a few posts down) that everybody else decided to post in. ;)
Oh, and you're mistaken. Again, see the other one for why...

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
tundrawalker 08-18-07, 09:44 PM	Double post, sorry. Don't you hate when that happens!
Majick 08-19-07, 12:31 PM	I agree completely with this statment: They should unquestionably be able to be used together I believe this was most likely the original intent of the wizards boards chaps and chap-ettes, and if not, then it should have been, because it makes perfect sense that the in-between-moves-'attack'-action would simply be "You may make a standard action attack during your movement phase at any point, then continue to move after"
Crimson_Concerto 08-19-07, 01:22 PM	I agree completely with this statment: They should unquestionably be able to be used together I believe this was most likely the original intent of the wizards boards chaps and chap-ettes, and if not, then it should have been, because it makes perfect sense that the in-between-moves-'attack'-action would simply be "You may make a standard action attack during your movement phase at any point, then continue to move after"...This topic was double-posted. Check the one (a few posts down) that everybody else decided to post in. ;) Oh, and you're mistaken. Again, see the other one for why...