| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Warric03-19-07, 04:25 PM | Could someone please tell me how the following example works? A character has Combat Expertise and Power Attack. In combat, on his turn he decides to take -2 to hit for Power Attack and -3 to hit for Combat Expertise. Do these stack for a total of -5 for all attacks during that round or do they overlap for a total of -3? Also, I know you can use Combat Expertise in conjunction with fighting defensively, so do these penalties stack as well? For instance say a character decided on -5 to hit to get +5 AC and also decided to fight defensively (-4 to hit, +2 AC). Would the total penalty be -9 to hit or -5 to hit? Thanks in advance |
| WinterPsionic03-19-07, 04:30 PM | -5 and -9 |
| tarkin03-19-07, 04:31 PM | Say you have a BAB of 4. You combat expertise for -2 (not wishing to take the full -4 you could take). Then you Power attack for -3 (again, not taking the full -4 you could take). You have a net -5 penalty to hit. Then you throw in fighting defensively, -4 to hit, +2 to AC) You are now a net -9 to hit, with +4 AC (2 expertise, 2 fighting defensively) and do an extra +3 damage (assuming using a one handed weapon). |
| Ranger REG03-19-07, 08:51 PM | Could someone please tell me how the following example works? A character has Combat Expertise and Power Attack. In combat, on his turn he decides to take -2 to hit for Power Attack and -3 to hit for Combat Expertise. Do these stack for a total of -5 for all attacks during that round or do they overlap for a total of -3? They must be paid for separately, so the penalties stack: -5. Also, I know you can use Combat Expertise in conjunction with fighting defensively, so do these penalties stack as well? For instance say a character decided on -5 to hit to get +5 AC and also decided to fight defensively (-4 to hit, +2 AC). Would the total penalty be -9 to hit or -5 to hit? Both Fighting Defensively and Combat Expertise benefits and penalties stack: boost +7 to AC, but suffer -9 to attacks. |
| Nom03-19-07, 09:38 PM | and do an extra +3 damage (assuming using a one handed weapon).And that you are actually capable of hitting with a -9 penalty. :) All other things being equal, the character in Tarkin's example would have been better to use CE for -4 and not fight defensively. They'd still get +4 AC, but would only suffer a -7 to hit (-4 CE, -3 PA vs -2 CE, -3 PA, -4 defensive). |
| Warric03-20-07, 09:05 AM | Thanks much.... Warric |
| runestar03-20-07, 09:15 AM | All other things being equal, the character in Tarkin's example would have been better to use CE for -4 and not fight defensively. They'd still get +4 AC, but would only suffer a -7 to hit (-4 CE, -3 PA vs -2 CE, -3 PA, -4 defensive). Depends. If you are going to be hitting on a natural 20 anyways, might as well fight defensively as well, since you aren't really any worse off. Your chance of hitting will never go below 5%, regardless of how big a penalty you take to your to-hit rating. So in the most extreme case, just go all out power attack and expertise + fighting defensively.:) |