| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| gullas02-27-07, 08:07 AM | Improved towershield profficiencie prerequisite: Shield prof , Tower shield prof , str 16 , bab 5 benefits:you can use tower shieldwitout the normal attack roll penalty , also you get +4 on resisting bullrush attempts when facing enemy enemy with a tower shield , also you can shield bash with Tower shield at the cost of -2 on attack rolls , the damage from this shield bash would be 1d8 insted of 1d6 with shield spikes . Normal: when using a tower shield take the attack roll normal penalty. Special: Fighters can select this feat as a bonus feat:rolleyes: . so my question is this has WOTC released some kind of feat like this , if not how do you like it:)?? Btw real Iceman helped me alot with this feat:) |
| Moribund02-27-07, 09:02 AM | You would need to indicate how much damage a bash with tower shield does. Most of WotC's feats relating to tower shields are based on increasing the defensive value of the feat as opposed to taking away the attack penalty. That said I don't often see tower shields used in games, though taking away the associated attack penalty would go a long way towards making them useful. |
| Thalspar02-27-07, 09:14 AM | ABOUT TIME when thinking about it the tower shield is great and with this one it is complete. yeah i know it has HUGE ARMOR CHECK PENALITY but it has against that cover. all tanker who doesn't give a dam about the penality this is a godsgift. |
| obrysii02-27-07, 09:24 AM | The tower shield was useful in 3.0, when it granted Cover (and therefore by association, a huge AC bonus and reflex save bonus). Now it's not worth the attack penalty. |
| Shadowfax702-27-07, 09:27 AM | also you get +4 on resisting bullrush attempts when facing enemy enemy with a tower shield The feat is good enough w/o this in it. You are avoiding a -2 attack roll penalty and being allowed to shield bash with a shield you normally couldn't shield bash with (albeit at a -2 penalty). I suggest shield bash damage for a Tower Shield at 1d6, spiked 1d8 (if you house rule that you can put spikes on a Tower Shield). |
| gullas02-27-07, 10:18 AM | Yeah I was thinkig of using 1d8 instead of 1d6 as the damage for shield bashing with a tower shield :) .... mabey this feat would cut down the check penalty about 50% when using a tower shield also:) ? |
| jaelis02-27-07, 11:30 AM | Just removing the -2 penalty would be a fine feat. I wouldn't add anything else. |
| gullas02-27-07, 12:01 PM | Originally Posted by gullas View Post also you get +4 on resisting bullrush attempts when facing enemy enemy with a tower shield The feat is good enough w/o this in it. . I thought that first but then I thought why taking this feat just to loose the -2 on attack rolls , it had to have some other great yummy stuff;) |
| kjenks02-27-07, 12:07 PM | Check out the hide shield from Sandstorm. |
| Shadowfax702-27-07, 12:52 PM | I thought that first but then I thought why taking this feat just to loose the -2 on attack rolls , it had to have some other great yummy stuff;)Being able to bash with a Tower Shield is GREAT YUMMY STUFF already !!! And I would not suggest going higher than 1d6 on a regular bash (unspiked; d8 spiked if house ruled) due to preserving the order of damage from light to heavy to tower shield. Most feats do 1 major thing, or 2 moderate things or 3-4 minor things. Saving yourself a -2 attack roll penalty is definitely not a minor thing, as it would require 2x the Weapon Focus feat to alleviate or a +2 Str bonus. |
| gullas02-27-07, 05:55 PM | updated , this is the final look on the feat "PEACH" please Improved Tower shield profficiencie prerequisite: Shield prof , Tower shield prof , str 16 , bab 5 benefits:you can use tower shield witout the normal attack roll penalty , also you get +4 on resisting bullrush attempts when using full cover or fighting defensively, also you can shield bash with Tower shield at the cost of -2 on attack rolls , the damage from this shield bash would be 1d8 instead of 1d6 with shield spikes . Normal: when using a tower shield take the attack roll normal penalty. Special: Fighters can select this feat as a bonus feat if they meet the prerequisite . |
| kjenks02-27-07, 07:31 PM | Hide shield. Sandstorm, page 99. No special proficiency required. Cost 50 gp. Shield bonus +3. Maximum dex bonus +4. Armor Check penalty -3. Arcane Spell Failure 30%. Weight 30 lb. Provides "cover as a tower shield does. By giving up your attacks for the round, you gain total cover. The shield does not, however, provide cover against targeted spells; a spellcaster can target the shield. Since it is made of lighter material than a tower shield, you only take a -1 penalty on attack rolls while wielding a hide shield in combat. You cannot bash with a hide shield, nor can you use your shield hand for anything else." |
| Shadowfax702-27-07, 08:38 PM | updated , this is the final look on the feat "PEACH" pleaseIMO it's overpowered for a feat as I have pointed out. However, I do like the idea of the feat. |