Post/Author/DateTime	Post
GreyLord 04-23-04, 03:34 PM	Okay, I'm not a big fan of 3.5 simply because, well I'm not. Most of those I get to play have 3.0 rules (actually I'm the only one with 3.5 rulebooks) and refuse to spend money on more books this soon after the release of the original 3e core. I plan on incorporating some of the UA rules into the 3.0 rules, and don't see there being much conflict. I'm thinking about allowing the prestige classes, the racial paragons (if they get high enough level and meet requirements of course), perhaps trying out the alternate experience used in the back of the book, and maybe, just maybe allowing Gestalt classes (not certain about the Gestalt, they seem a little powerful, and when with a larger group, perhaps overly powerful). What would you or would you not use from UA in a 3.0 game and how would you use it
Cathon 04-23-04, 04:43 PM	The only thing I can think of that might require extra tweaking to use with 3.0 instead of 3.5 would be armor as DR since DR ranges are different in 3.5 and using base classes as prestige classes. Otherwise it is pretty much the exact same effort to add UA rules to 3.0 as to 3.5.