| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| DrWorm11-05-04, 07:39 PM | I have looked through UA, and I have looked at the BS alternate class, and I have always liked it. The one thing I am having a problem with is that I have read many people state that the BS ignores arcane spell failure. Where are you getting this idea? Sure they can use light armor, but nowere does it say that the light armor spell faiure is negated. At least no where I have seen. Can somone help me out here? I would love this to be true, but I need a reference. |
| MetalGemini11-05-04, 08:00 PM | I believe it says they cast in light armor as a bard. That implies that as long as they are in light armor, they ignore the ASF like a bard. |
| Morwen11-05-04, 08:11 PM | Page 56: Spellcasting: A battle sorcerer can cast sorcerer spells derived from her class levels of battle sorcerer while in light armor without the normal arcane spell failure chance. |
| DrWorm11-05-04, 10:09 PM | alright..I must have missed it. I do not have my book here, but will confirm when I get home. |
| tiggrhoo11-18-04, 01:37 AM | Actually, I thought that was the whole point to battle sorcerer. No one I play with would consider this class without that feature. |