Whirling Frenzy & Natural Attacks? [Archive] - Wizards Community

Post/Author/DateTimePost
hobson1975

02-25-04, 09:50 AM
I have a werebear barbarian who wants to use whirling frenzy vs. rage. With whirling frenzy you get an additional attack at your highest BAB minus 2. Now what does this mean for barbarians with natural attacks? In this example would the werebear get one additional claw or two additional claw attacks since the claws are the primary weapon at at the highest BAB.

Thoughts?
badger3k

02-27-04, 09:59 PM
Looking for posts on the whirling frenzy and saw this one. Personally, I'd just use one claw attack, since the way I read it, the full attack is two claws and one bite, so one attack would be one claw. I like the whirling frenzy since it has no drawback - the +4 to Str counters the -2 penalty to hit, so you get an extra attack for +2 damage. Not bad.