| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| rogue_lettuce06-30-06, 09:57 AM | I was reading through the AEG 3.0 book "Feats," and came across a feat called Spell Turning. If I was an illiterate character/race, and I took this feat, would the illiteracy override it or not? :P </poor humour> |
| kelvinaw27306-30-06, 11:12 AM | If literacy is not required or is not implied to be required (for example by stating you must have learned a wizard spell) in the feat description then literate or not would have no effect, one would assume. |
| rogue_lettuce06-30-06, 12:00 PM | Too subtle? The feat is: "Spell Turning You always spell the word 'turning' correctly" I know it's copyright, but they REALLY won't complain, cmon, it's a JOKE! :) |
| Dei06-30-06, 03:58 PM | *giggle* :P |
| kelvinaw27307-01-06, 03:17 AM | Too subtle? The feat is: "Spell Turning You always spell the word 'turning' correctly" I know it's copyright, but they REALLY won't complain, cmon, it's a JOKE! :) Whimpers in pain and takes 1d4 Int and Wis damage from backlash ... that was BAD. Really, really bad. So bad it is in a world of badness on its own, in the badsville bad town of bad planet in bad galaxy. Some things are so bad they are good, but that went through that threshhold and back into bad again, only now so dire and abysmal that it can inflict damage on the unwary. |
| SpanishElf07-01-06, 04:26 AM | I'd say you can spell "turning" correctly you just would not know what you were writing meant unless someone had already told you. ;) |
| rogue_lettuce07-01-06, 06:03 AM | I'd say you can spell "turning" correctly you just would not know what you were writing meant unless someone had already told you. ;) Hmmm interesting interpretation. Surely one would have to understand the word to technically be able to spell it? Maybe it means you know what letters go in what order, but can't write it becase you don't know what the characters look like? PS: I did say it was poor humour. :P |
| kelvinaw27307-01-06, 08:02 AM | PS: I did say it was poor humour. :P You did NOT say that it was dire, unspeakably bad humour that shoul d not even be called humour at all save in attempt to put a spin on an inane play on words. "Poor" is inadequate to sum up the state the plumbs new depths of linguistic double-meanings that this is. |
| rogue_lettuce07-01-06, 03:02 PM | I meant it was humour for people of low-income families, and we all know they're not the smartest, right? Bah. more puns... Two puns = pun pun? Bah.. and another. :( |
| Pangeon07-02-06, 01:36 AM | Wat is wit dis feet sell turnin i donts geet it. ;) |
| Shaggy_Shaggs07-02-06, 01:47 AM | Horrible "joke", but I'll bite. Hmmm interesting interpretation. Surely one would have to understand the word to technically be able to spell it? Maybe it means you know what letters go in what order, but can't write it becase you don't know what the characters look like? The character may have learned the appearance of the whole word by rote, and the sequence of letter sounds the same way. |