| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombiegleemaxMay 20, 2008 12:25:14 | I've seen a few posts asking where specific forums went. Here's what's been done so far: "D&D 4th Edition" has been renamed "D&D" and becomes the main forums for all D&D discussion, regardless of edition. There will still be a Future Releases forum for speculation on upcoming releases, and a smaller Previous Editions area. Here is the discussion thread about the forums re-org http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1030763 D&D Fundamentals Races, Classes & Teirs, Powers, skills, and feats were merged into Character Building New forums:
D&D Community
4E Adventures, previously under D&D 4th edition fundamentals, renamed Campaign & Adventure Workshop and moved under D&D Community D&D 4th Edition Campaign Settings Category renamed D&D Worlds. Eberron and Forgotten Realms forums combined into one forum each; Greyhawk and Dragonlance merged into "Other Campaign Settings" Plan for the "Previous Editions" forums: Forums/threads will be consolidated to the new main area or to the following Previous Editions forums, as appropriate:
Update: Here is what happened to the rest of the Previous Editions forums. I didn't add links because it was such a big re-org. Gamer_Zer0 will be providing descriptions. Moved to main D&D boards, link added to HQ --Community Business Monsters & Races --Races --Monsters' Lair Classes & Class Features --Classes and Prestige Classes ---Prestige Classes --Epic Level Equipment, Feats, and Skills --Powers, Skills and Feats --Equipment and Combat Spells, Invocations, Psionics, and Magic Items --Magic and Spells --Psionics Adventures, Campaigns & Encounters --D&D Adventures --Deities and the Planes --Campaign Workshop --Digital D&D --Oriental Adventures "Other Published Worlds" in main D&D section --Dragonlance --Birthright --Dark Sun --Greyhawk --Mystara --Planescape --Ravenloft --Spelljammer --Alternity Products Moved to Legacy: --D&D Forum FAQs ---The Library --Regdar's Repository --Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition --Unearthed Arcana and House Rules -- D&D Accessories (Archived) |
| #2ZherogMay 20, 2008 12:31:11 | In the sort term, could we please have a link to the new version of What's a Player to Do? There's a link for the DM equivalent, and I think such a link would help alleviate some of the questions. If both links could be placed where the forums previously were located, that'd be aces. ![]() |
| #3ZherogMay 20, 2008 12:32:15 | Also...
![]() this doesn't make any sense as a means of splitting forums... |
| #4celloshaneMay 20, 2008 12:53:35 | Also... Actually Zherog that's an exact copy of Wrecan's suggested layout minus the expository text. See Here. It's not my favorite layout, but I suppose I can live with it if that's final. |
| #5seTinyMay 20, 2008 12:55:52 | Also... It's from wrecan's original list in the reorg discussion. I did a double take as well when you quoted Michelle, but the descriptions help a little. # Previous Edition HQ * Monsters & Races You start out here... * Class Features Then you get one of these... * Extraordinary Ability Which gives you Abilities, Equipment, Feats, Maneuvers, Skills, Tricks and Special Materials... * Spell-Like & Supernatural Power And possibly some Invocations, Magic Items, Planes, Powers, Psionics and Spells... * Adventures, Campaigns & Encounters So you can experience these... * Previous Edition General ...and everything else goes here |
| #42rob_douglasMay 23, 2008 10:08:35 | Oh sweet jesus, screwed up like putting some of the epic topics in the Character Building forum, you guys do realize that epic play in 3.5 encompasses many different topics including classes (and as such, had a forum of its own) right? QFT - Hear, Hear! I found you guys - or at least some of you....and some posts. I don't even know where to post the thread I was planning to do - which was to discuss the 4E economy as it affects Epic and how we can learn in the existing Epic games from that. Plus a second discussion on Minions and how they affected Epic games. I guess that would go in the Monsters forum - but the idea was to help bring 4E ideas to Epic games, so the thread now won't be seen by the intended audience. Keep Epic in your titles, so I can find the threads. I can't possibly subscribe to all those forums it would take to keep up any more.... I guess I will be back when the epic stuff finally gets broken out. Of course that will never happen because we won't reach the 25 post threshold if everyone is waiting until this reorg becomes usable to use it....Catch-22. I don't have the time to be responsible for making this place usable again... ROB |
| #43ZherogMay 23, 2008 10:13:15 | If the idea is to hit the 3.5 audience, I'd say the general forum of that section would be the best location. |
| #44r3gularkMay 23, 2008 17:34:32 | Can we still use the Dungeon Master Advice and Player Advice section for 3.x questions as well? Because without there being one on the previous editions section, and for those of us who don't want to make the switch, I for one would still like to bounce ideas off of other DMs. |
| #45ZherogMay 23, 2008 18:54:11 | I've asked that question several times without an answer. I'm going with "yes" as the answer for Player Advice until I'm told otherwise. |
| #46eldritch_lordMay 23, 2008 20:32:30 | Oh, and where's the psionics forum? If it's been cut or merged I'll have a whole new reason to complain. It's been merged with the Magic & Spells forum. Congratulations, we have yet another Psionic X. Ironic, isn't it? |
| #47Seeker95May 24, 2008 7:02:14 | I've asked that question several times without an answer. I'm going with "yes" as the answer for Player Advice until I'm told otherwise. I would disagree. We have D&D 3.5 General which will work for any question that is not related to one of the other 5 categories. And most player questions will be related to the other five areas. |
| #48Seeker95May 24, 2008 7:07:47 | why in the nine hells and every layer of the abyss couldn't you have justed plopped the 4e forums on top of the 3.5e forums and, like you've already done, label them Old Editions. Easy answer. For the same reason a car dealer does not devote the same amount of space for his 2007 models after the 2008 models come out. Consider the fact that we have 6 Boards instead of 1 the equivalence of the clearance sale. 4e is WotC's new line. It is not prudent to devote as much "floor space" and/or support (whether active or passive) to the old line as to the new. |
| #49wrecanMay 24, 2008 7:47:55 | I'm surprised Wizards is keeping six forums. When White Wolf upgraded editions, we got one "Old World of Darkness" forum. |
| #50thaxMay 24, 2008 8:22:41 | Prestige Class Subforum: Very clearcut need for this to divide classes and prestige classes, the two rely on each other but are still distinctly different. Having an extra forum makes things less messy There are no PrC's in 4th edition. Perhaps a new PP/ED forum will be made eventually. Psionics: Okay, this one seriously irks me. The Psionics forum may not have the highest postcount but the rules for psionics were significantly different from magic, enough so to grant them their own forum in the first place. There were a good number of very unique posts and plenty of contributors and, to be honest simply lumping them in with two other categories is a bit insulting. In 4th edition Psionics are just another power source and do not have different rules like in the previous editions. More than likely the 4th edition classes and a race or two will be in a PHB rather than having a book of it's own. Forgotten Realms and Eberron: These two forums had subforums split in to categories for ease of use, it's getting ridiculously hard to find anything in either world forum not to mention the amount of traffic, there was really no need to break down the subforums. I would guess that new sub forums will be added when the new 4th ed versions of the settings come out. Epic Level Forum: What in the hells happened to this? I can't find it anywhere and it was a perfectly viable forum given that 3.X epic discussions are different from non-epic discussion 4th edition does not have seperate rules for Epic play but instead has the three different tiers of the character (Newbie/Paragon/Epic) that is split up by levels. (1-9, 10-19, 20-30) Now I know that the Newbie level is called something else, but I am having a brain fart at the moment. Perhaps eventually forums will be made for the other tiers, but no one is at that point yet since the new edition is not yet released. Other Worlds: This one is ridiculous. There were forums made for each different world because they were all inherently different and didn't belong together. It's like joining together the forgotten realms and eberron boards, you'd have a pack of raving lunatics on your hands. Just because the number of regular posters were low doesn't mean they deserved this. It's a little disappointing Really, if there is enough call for it I would think that a forum would be made for the world setting in question. Which setting didn't get the separate entry? Character Optimization: Honestly I have no idea what you did to these poor folks, but seems like it was enough to get some of them to jump ship to www.brilliantgameologists.com. Well, going to another web page is alright. That is what we had to do to continue the Respite. Clearly, good role playing is not allowed on this site. In Closing, I have no idea what the point of lumping together clearly useful and relevant forums was, but wouldn't it have saved yourselves and a lot of unhappy forumgoers a ton of grief and unhappiness if you had just plopped the 4e forums on top of the 3.5e forums? The main reason is that Wizards wants to eradicate any support for 3rd edition and support the new edition that is coming out. I am sure that Piazo will have forums of their own for Pathfinder that will answer any questions about 3rd edition. |
| #51ZherogMay 24, 2008 8:57:59 | I'm surprised Wizards is keeping six forums. When White Wolf upgraded editions, we got one "Old World of Darkness" forum. And on top of having six now, they've said that if traffic numbers warrant it, they'll expand the section. I think they could've handled the actual reorganization better (informing communities where there stuff would be afterwards, shutting down for a day and taking their time rather than doing it while people were active, etc). But I think it's pretty difficult to complain about getting six forums - with the chance for more - for a system that isn't going to make WotC any money. |
| #52wrecanMay 24, 2008 9:01:02 | Forgotten Realms, Eberron, Other Worlds, and Character Optimization are now 4th edition forums, so four of the seven forums you mentioned in fact were targeted at 4e forums. 3rd edition is a "Previous Edition" now and garners Wizards no revenue. It shouldn't be surprising that it will receive reduced support from Wizards. As I wrote earlier, it's remarkable that Wizards has dedicated six forums to Third Edition. White Wolf condensed all the Old World of Darkness Forums into one forum at its edition change, forcing Werewolf, Vampire, Mage, Changeling and Hunter players to share a space! Everybody managed it, though (after, of course, a few months of whining and accusations that White Wolf is an evil corporation out only for money and caring nothing for loyal customers). |
| #53rhialtoMay 24, 2008 9:07:35 | Those grognards who play(ed) 3rd edition and/or use the campaign worlds created in days bygone, they are the most obvious ready market for any 4E products. Driving us away as they are doing is a sure-fire way to persuade us NOT to buy into 4E. WotC's marketing wonks need to re-apply for their jobs. |
| #54winterwordsMay 25, 2008 3:38:08 | Trying to find anything is like playing the Crystal Maze now. What a mess ![]() |
| #55Prof._PacaliMay 29, 2008 12:42:40 | General rule of thumb: Don't ask for legal advice over the inernets. I would modify that to "Don't ask for, or accept, legal advice from anyone who is not admitted to practice law in your state. The technical term for a person doing so is the unauthorized practice of law. Disclaimer: this information is not provided in response to a request for legal advice, nor is it intended to be construed as such." As a side note, does anyone in the New York metropolitan area want to hire a paralegal? ![]() |
| #56wrecanMay 31, 2008 6:57:01 | The initial post needs to be updated to indicate what happened to Out-of-Print and where such discussions should go in the future. |
| #57timlagorJun 03, 2008 3:42:51 | I would modify that to "Don't ask for, or accept, legal advice from anyone who is not admitted to practice law in your state. In New York, the technical term for a person doing so is the unauthorized practice of law. Disclaimer: this information is not provided in response to a request for legal advice, nor is it intended to be construed as such." :P |