| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1vaalingrade_ashland_02May 13, 2008 14:51:20 | These boards have gotten markedly more 4chan-like in the last year than any forum healthily should be and a lot of it has to do with the glut of image macro use. Pretty much a third of all threads now eventually devolve into people posting stupid pictures declaring how much fail the people they're arguing with has instead of, ya know, actually discussing and making points. I can't really think of any actual value having the tag serves on boards like these or if the value would even outweight the general jerkishness of the macros being used, but there you have it. |
| #2TsuulMay 13, 2008 15:03:49 | I have to respectfully disagree. I don't see this trend in any of the areas I frequent. Which areas are they a problem in? |
| #3ZherogMay 13, 2008 15:07:19 | Pretty much a third of all threads now eventually devolve into people posting stupid pictures declaring how much fail the people they're arguing with has instead of, ya know, actually discussing and making points. Either you and I read entirely different threads (quite possible, given the sheer volume), or you're exaggerating just a wee bit here. ;) |
| #4gamer_zer0May 13, 2008 16:19:19 | These boards have gotten markedly more 4chan-like in the last year than any forum healthily should be and a lot of it has to do with the glut of image macro use. It's interesting. I'll bring it up at our next CM team meeting and see what folks think about the value of the IMG tag. |
| #5mudbunnyMay 13, 2008 16:20:26 | It's interesting. I'll bring it up at our next CM team meeting and see what folks think about the value of the IMG tag. I wonder if it would be possible to have the option of disabling it, the way you can signatures. |
| #6gamer_zer0May 13, 2008 16:57:19 | I wonder if it would be possible to have the option of disabling it, the way you can signatures. That's an even better idea. I'll talk it around. I have no strong opinions on this either way, but I bet I will after I talk with the rest of the team. =) |
| #7KeithricMay 13, 2008 19:16:57 | Yeah, I'd much prefer a per-user disable than disabling it in all instances ![]() |
| #8ecalsneergMay 13, 2008 19:23:58 | I've seen maybe two thread recently using pictures on the D&D forums. Yeah, I've seen one or two images used in other threads, but it's still less than 2-3% of threads, at most. |
| #9TsuulMay 13, 2008 21:47:50 | Users can already disable the IMG tag on their own in their options. Under "Thread Display Options" [x]Show Images (including attached images and images in [IMG ] code) |
| #10mudbunnyMay 13, 2008 22:04:15 | Currently, you can disable individual signatures. What is being asked is if the same can be done for Image tags. |
| #11seTinyMay 13, 2008 22:29:30 | Currently, you can disable individual signatures. What is being asked is if the same can be done for Image tags. I just looked through the options and it is already an option like Tsuul said. First set of options under Thread Display Options: You have the option to show or hide various elements of messages, which may be of use to users on slow internet connections, or who want to remove extraneous clutter from posts. |
| #42PaulonMay 19, 2008 22:28:31 | Images are used a lot in the chaotic fiction roleplaying threads in the Play By Post Haven. Losing the ability to use them would be rather annoying. |