| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombiegleemaxDec 12, 2008 10:44:10 | I feel that this would result in people being more prudent and less willing to violate the CoC if they knew that being banned even for a day would lose their custom account features. It doesn't even have to be permanentally...maybe a week each time you are banned or something. It would certainly lower the amount of rude/elitist type posts that seem to have taken an upswing. What do you think? |
| #2Cpt_MichaDec 12, 2008 10:51:33 | Personally I don't think anything but Ip bans really work on people. |
| #3farmer42_dupDec 12, 2008 10:59:49 | IP bans won't really do a lot either...they are really easy to workaround if you know how to (and it's not hard to learn how to either) Yes, but working around an IP ban in the US is borderline harassment, and is open to litigation. |
| #4vaalingrade_ashland_02Dec 12, 2008 11:24:14 | Yeah, IP bans are the only way. Also, only Uncon Winners even have custom account bling and that's a prize. |
| #5mudbunnyDec 12, 2008 11:56:47 | The people that would get a CT or CA, are generally not the type of people who will end up getting banned. |
| #6ZherogDec 12, 2008 12:30:13 | Also, only Uncon Winners even have custom account bling and that's a prize. That's not completely true. For example, there are contests on What's a DM to Do? and What's a Player to Do? that award custom titles as a prize. There's a bunch of other CTs around as well. I believe your statement is correct, though, for most custom avatars. The rest, as Mudbunny points out, are the folks least likely to cause problems. |
| #7fabius_maximusDec 13, 2008 15:08:22 | Yes, but working around an IP ban in the US is borderline harassment, and is open to litigation. You mean reconnecting to your provider is illegal? |
| #8Cpt_MichaDec 15, 2008 12:59:43 | Do you honestly think that most of our problem trolls would go through that effort? |
| #9darqueravenDec 15, 2008 14:32:30 | You mean reconnecting to your provider is illegal? No reconnecting to your provider is not illegal. But there are ways to get around bans. Sites that mask your IP Address and such. The people that want to cause trouble, will. It comes with having to prove someone did something. Totally locking out the account and keeping a record, so once they come back and start it up again. Is the only way IMHO, because the ones that cause trouble will brag about how they were banned and got back in. But that takes keeping close eyes on all the posts. And with an user group the size of what we have... that is hard. |
| #10ZherogDec 15, 2008 17:52:03 | Totally locking out the account and keeping a record, so once they come back and start it up again. Is the only way IMHO, because the ones that cause trouble will brag about how they were banned and got back in. But that takes keeping close eyes on all the posts. And with an user group the size of what we have... that is hard. If you see somebody bragging about this, report them. It's specifically against the CoC. |
| #11fabius_maximusDec 16, 2008 4:36:18 | No reconnecting to your provider is not illegal. But there are ways to get around bans. Sites that mask your IP Address and such. The people that want to cause trouble, will. It comes with having to prove someone did something. If you have a provider with dynamic IPs, you don't need to go to such lengths. You just reconnect and you get a new IP. That's why IP bans are such an unreliable method. |
| #12vaalingrade_ashland_02Dec 16, 2008 22:59:44 | If you see somebody bragging about this, report them. It's specifically against the CoC. Which gets them banned, at which they come back and brag about it again, which gets them banned, at which point they come back and brag about it, which gets them banned, at which point they come back and brag about it, which gets them banned, at which point they come back and brag about it, which gets them banned... Actually, it usually doesn't get them banned, it just gets silently edited. |
| #13calronmoonflowerDec 17, 2008 1:16:32 | perfect solution fallacy IP bans are not perfect, but they can work. We've had one person that posted something awful enough to get a IP ban and they haven't been back sense. That poster was a well known problem with multiple sock puppets and more than one permanent ban. That is the only IP ban that I know of being used here and it worked. On the other side I know of a poster that has taken steps to avoid an IP ban, has at least 10 permanent bans, and has dragged about this on the boards. Guess what? Because they don't aggressively reban those that use sock puppets he is still here. I'd suggest both methods be used. |
| #14yaeriDec 17, 2008 16:45:49 | Which gets them banned, at which they come back and brag about it again, which gets them banned, at which point they come back and brag about it, which gets them banned, at which point they come back and brag about it, which gets them banned, at which point they come back and brag about it, which gets them banned... Don't stop now man; tell us how it ends! ![]() |
| #15vaalingrade_ashland_02Dec 18, 2008 19:21:01 | Don't stop now man; tell us how it ends! IT DOESN'T ![]() |
| #16orc_bethanna_dupDec 20, 2008 21:32:14 | This thread has been closed per VCL request. Thanks! |