| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1gamer_zer0Jul 07, 2008 19:19:48 | D&D Community Creations would be a place where people post their homebrewed ideas for things for 4th Edition. For example: New Classes New Monsters Art Fan Fiction Maps Campaigns Adventures We could also add a second forum which we could call the Best Of D&D Community Creations, where we'd have some system where the really good stuff gets copied/moved over to the a forum that is read only. Let me know your thoughts. |
| #2mudbunnyJul 07, 2008 19:54:14 | This would be great. Currently, there is some fuzziness over whether home-brewed classes go into house-rules or the role forum. This would make it clear where. |
| #3WebsterJul 07, 2008 20:43:10 | I like the idea. ![]() |
| #4lord_karsusJul 07, 2008 21:07:13 | -A good idea. A good name, too. -I don't know about the fan-fiction part, though. In the past, there have been 'complications' with fan-fiction posts being posted on these boards. |
| #5trappedsliderJul 07, 2008 23:17:06 | -A good idea. A good name, too. you mean the bit about WotC owning anything posted on here sicne the ToS or the CoC got last updated? |
| #6mudbunnyJul 07, 2008 23:44:29 | you mean the bit about WotC owning anything posted on here sicne the ToS or the CoC got last updated? Except that isn't true. Not in the slightest. |
| #7lord_karsusJul 08, 2008 0:08:05 | you mean the bit about WotC owning anything posted on here sicne the ToS or the CoC got last updated? -Yeah. Except that isn't true. -Are you sure about that? There was certainly some conflict about this exact thing from a certain poster a few months ago. |
| #8BelorinJul 08, 2008 0:11:42 | I like this as idea, I would organize it like this, though. New Classes New Monsters New Races Campaigns Adventures Maps Then put Art & Fan Fiction in it's own area. Bel |
| #9trappedsliderJul 08, 2008 0:14:01 | Except that isn't true. if applicable, by posting or submitting any text, images, designs, video, sound, code, data, lists, or other materials or information (such User-submitted content, collectively, "User Content") to or through the Site, including without limitation on any User profile page, you hereby irrevocably grant to Wizards, its affiliates and sublicensees, a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, non-exclusive, and fully sub-licensable license, to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such User Content (in whole or in part) in any media and to incorporate the User Content into other works in any format or medium now known or later developed. Then what exactly does that mean? ![]() |
| #10lord_karsusJul 08, 2008 0:27:19 | -Yeah, that's the part. |
| #11fippy_darkpawJul 08, 2008 1:04:37 | Sounds like a great forum. Would be especially interested in Adventures for other groups to play test. |
| #12calronmoonflowerJul 08, 2008 1:25:57 | Sounds like a good forum idea. |
| #13alumanJul 08, 2008 2:15:03 | if applicable, by posting or submitting any text, images, designs, video, sound, code, data, lists, or other materials or information (such User-submitted content, collectively, "User Content") to or through the Site, including without limitation on any User profile page, you hereby irrevocably grant to Wizards, its affiliates and sublicensees, a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, non-exclusive, and fully sub-licensable license, to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such User Content (in whole or in part) in any media and to incorporate the User Content into other works in any format or medium now known or later developed. This is actually fairly standard language on forum ToS's What you write on forums copyrighted by you, if you do not effectively give away you copyrights (by a clause like that above), then the moderators are in violation of certain IP statues (mostly buried in the DMCA laws) when they delete posts. From Paradox Interactive's Forums All content posted on the message boards of Paradox is the exclusive intellectual property of Paradox. Copyright ownership resides in that content by Paradox and the Company is free to use any of the content as they wish. Anyone other than Paradox seeking to reprint, republish, or reproduce content posted on the Paradox message boards must receive the express written permission from the Webmaster of the Paradox forum in which the content was posted. By posting on the Paradox message boards you are agreeing to the above and relinquishing all copyright to the contents of the post(s) to Paradox. |
| #14theizzyJul 08, 2008 2:21:49 | Ill join in on the sounds like a good idea bandwagon. Would be interesting to hear(read) what kind of system your looking at to decide what gets copied over to the read only forum? some sort of peer review perhaps? votes? Izzy |
| #15mudbunnyJul 08, 2008 9:07:36 | if applicable, by posting or submitting any text, images, designs, video, sound, code, data, lists, or other materials or information (such User-submitted content, collectively, "User Content") to or through the Site, including without limitation on any User profile page, you hereby irrevocably grant to Wizards, its affiliates and sublicensees, a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, non-exclusive, and fully sub-licensable license, to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such User Content (in whole or in part) in any media and to incorporate the User Content into other works in any format or medium now known or later developed. It means that you give WotC permission to use any works that you develop and print on their forums. However, you still own the rights to your idea. That section does not remove any of your rights. You can still do what you want with your idea. |
| #16ZherogJul 08, 2008 9:18:07 | Which is actually better than the old ToU, which simply gave everything to WotC. * Back on topic... I'll voice a dissenting opinion. In the past, stuff like this went in the appropriate subject matter forum -- new classes went on the classes forum, new monsters went in the monster forum, and so on. Why would we move away from that model? I'll counter the original proposal with the following: Allow the fan-created material to be placed in the existing forums, as has always been done. However, the "best of" forum idea is quite rocktastic, and would be a fine way to highlight some of the very awesome ideas that get posted around here. |
| #17wrecanJul 08, 2008 9:33:14 | I don't know. The "best of" forum sounds like it would need heavy moderation. I'd need to know more about how stuff got nominated and selected for the "Best Of". I like the idea for Community Creations, though I agree with those who said Art and Fanfiction belong elsewhere. Also, would this render Adventure and Campaign Workshop redundant? |
| #18ZherogJul 08, 2008 9:35:30 | It would also seem to render the "House Rules" forum redundant. |
| #19wrecanJul 08, 2008 9:38:24 | Well, I assume House Rules would be for rules, like intoxication or wound penalties, but it does seem like there would be a lot of overlap. |
| #20ZherogJul 08, 2008 9:41:19 | And, frankly, I'm still not sure what was wrong with the "old" method of posting classes on the classes forum, monsters on the monster forum, etc. |
| #21saedarJul 08, 2008 9:41:50 | This sounds like a fun idea to me. I know that over at Enworld that they have a fan creations thing and it is fun. Only downside is that it is pretty disorganized. It would be great if you could have a series of subforum-type things. I also second the need to know how "Best of" would be determined. Also, I agree with the fan fiction stuff. Best to keep it elsewhere. |
| #22wotc_jotJul 08, 2008 11:38:46 | I suggested this forum to Mike because I'm trying to make it easier and more efficient for fans to share their original work and for other fans to find it and use it. If this forum works, than what it generates is a collection of new, usable material for D&D players. There's already a ton of good material out there, but it's not centralized. In my mind, there are fans who are more interested in seeing original work than in following conversations about published stuff. These fans would rather have one place to go to where they can find new races, new classes, etc., than have to find them in among the more typical comment threads. Centralizing the process would also create more positive feedback and lead to a more fans generating more original material. Once original material is recognized as its own special thing with its own forums, that ought to encourage people to contribute. General forums are also quite time-oriented. They are set up to show you what people are talking about right now. A place for original content is more about showing you what fans have accomplished in the last 3 months, or year, or whatever than about the latest hot topic. |
| #23guivreJul 08, 2008 11:53:35 | It means that you give WotC permission to use any works that you develop and print on their forums. However, you still own the rights to your idea. That section does not remove any of your rights. You can still do what you want with your idea. Err, no. It does remove some of your rights. You retain ownership but you have lost the rights to determine when, if, and how your copyrighted material is used by WotC. Nor is it limited to the forums. It's fairly draconian, possibly not enforceable, and definitely not worth taking the risk with. That being said I doubt WotC would take any material from here and use it. Any content creator is much better served posting a link to another site with their content. It's foolish to put copyrighted material here. |
| #24ZherogJul 08, 2008 11:59:50 | First, let me say that it's nice to see you poking around and taking an active interest in the forums, Jonathan. Having you folks in Renton participating can only be a good thing for the community. That said, I still disagree that all this material needs to be gathered into one place. As I said, under the old forum organization all this sort of stuff went into the forum with the most-pertinent topic. Just for an example, if you went into the old "Spells and Magic" forum, you would find a healthy mix of homebrewed spells, homebrewed magic items, and questions about WotC-published spells or magic items. The forum was alive and jumping and had some really wonderful people who knew their stuff, even if I didn't always agree with their opinions. I'm not away of anybody ever saying the forum was difficult to navigate, or anything like that. |
| #25lord_karsusJul 08, 2008 12:02:47 | -Honestly, every section could use a sticky that says "Homebrewed Spells/Races/Classes/etc." and that should handle things sufficiently enough. Have the FL of the section maintain it, and add people's stuff when they request it...Bada bing, bada boom, there you go. |
| #26the_ubbergeekJul 08, 2008 12:03:58 | Err, no. It does remove some of your rights. You retain ownership but you have lost the rights to determine when, if, and how your copyrighted material is used by WotC. Perhaps we should relax a bit about the anti-capitalistic feeling, first... Second, unless you want to publish, is that even important? I'd be actually *honored' if my idea found way in an official publcation *as long as I have a thank*. |
| #27guivreJul 08, 2008 12:06:09 | Perhaps we should relax a bit about the anti-capitalistic feeling, first... Who is anti-capitalistic? Your comment makes no sense whatsoever. Second, unless you want to publish, is that even important? I'd be actually *honored' if my idea found way in an official publcation *as long as I have a thank*. That is up to each individual to decide. The fact remains, you are giving up rights. |
| #28mudbunnyJul 08, 2008 12:12:12 | Err, no. It does remove some of your rights. You retain ownership but you have lost the rights to determine when, if, and how your copyrighted material is used by WotC. I said in the phrase immediately prior to my bolded part that by posting it to the WotC forums you were giving WotC permission to use it (or not)how they see fit. I don't see how what I wrote *doesn't* make that perfectly clear. |
| #29guivreJul 08, 2008 12:15:23 | I said in the phrase immediately prior to my bolded part that by posting it to the WotC forums you were giving WotC permission to use it (or not)how they see fit. No, you said: It means that you give WotC permission to use any works that you develop and print on their forums. However, you still own the rights to your idea. That section does not remove any of your rights. You can still do what you want with your idea. The first sentence is true. The second sentence is true. The third is completely false. The fourth is partially true. You are giving up rights there are no two ways about it. |
| #30the_ubbergeekJul 08, 2008 12:18:00 | Who is anti-capitalistic? Your comment makes no sense whatsoever. It's a classic anticorporatist stance. And? |
| #31ZherogJul 08, 2008 12:20:27 | I don't do this often, but... Perhaps we could stick to the topic of the thread, and hash out the idea of where custom content should be posted (and how)? |
| #32mudbunnyJul 08, 2008 12:20:41 | So you are saying that my post didn't make it perfectly clear that by posting something on the WOtC forums that you were giving permission to WotC to do as they see fit with whatever it was that you posted? Huh. In any case, anyone reading my post with a desire to understand will find what I wrote to be quite clear. I apologize for the partial thread derailment G0. |
| #33guivreJul 08, 2008 12:21:58 | It's a classic anticorporatist stance. I don't think you even realize what those words mean, not that "anticorporatist" is a word. So we're done here. |
| #34lord_karsusJul 08, 2008 12:27:07 | Perhaps we could stick to the topic of the thread, and hash out the idea of where custom content should be posted (and how)? -Well, the "original content rights" discussion is somewhat relevant. Maybe not on topic, but relevant in regards to the topic. Perhaps G0 can offer some elaboration, being that he's the big cheese. |
| #35mudbunnyJul 08, 2008 12:32:09 | I can see advantages to both situations. Putting all of the homebrew stuff in one area will make it easier for people looking specifically for homebrew stuff to find it. At the same time, leaving it with the duscussion about similar stuff from WotC makes it more likely that the people that will discuss it will b interested in the idea and will be knowedgeable in the topic. Thinking about it, I would have to revise my original agreement with the plan. Leave the house-ruled stuff with the rest of the stuff in the similar vein. However, I do agree that having a forum where homebrewed stuff is collected would be easier. One possibility is the following: Have a weekly vote by regulars in the forum (public or private) over whether any of the homebrewed stuff has reached a state of completion and should be included in the homebrew forum or some other manner of choosing some to be moved. |
| #36seTinyJul 08, 2008 12:40:49 | Now I see the merits of having a D&D Community Creations, but I propose a twist. A mixture of both the old way and the new forum might work. Work in Progress (WiP) go into the appropriate forums so that members can get feedback when/if they want it. Now when a WiP is no longer in progress and mostly finished (at least in the creator's eyes) have an area where they can post a new, clean thread of their finished work. The D&D Community Creations, would replace the "Best of". It gives a place that is easy to find new homebrewed creations that are complete, while allowing those that may need help a place where they can find it. I don't like the idea of a "Best of" as it can be discouraging to members that are new to the homebrewing arena. |